Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Butler County Care Facility

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Ohio
  3. Hamilton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Amy Parker
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This is my favorite SNF to work with. The staff truly cares about the whole patient, with compassion. I would feel comfortable bringing my loved ones to the team at Butler Care Center!

  • Lisa Moore
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Best care there is. Take well care of my mom. She loves it there. They have renovate the place and it is really nice. They have activites for them to do. Keep them busy. The staff and administrator are great people. They treat her like family. I am there quite offten even surprise vists. Everyone of the patients are well taken care. They recieve there baths, meds on a daily basis. And most of all well loved. If something happen to mom they always call and let me know no matter the time of day.

  • Ethan Farber
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This facility is a national security front. Their real business is evaluating young men who fit a certain personality profile (intelligent / aloof / technology-oriented) for loyalty to the "deep state". This facility specializes in seeing how people react to provocation. You will notice the residents will follow you around so you are always being watched. You will also notice that certain members of the low-level staff are overqualified. Watch out for that male LPN in the office and that older STNA who does the orientation - he pretends to be from Kentucky but speaks in a Brooklyn accent. He is actually ethnic Ukrainian. Part of their strategy to evaluate people is to recapitulate behaviors you have been seen exhibiting in the past - styles of dressing, manner, unusual preferences in material tastes, etc. You will see certain members of the staff will "mirror" or "re-enact" things you have done in the past. This is how they evaluate how you react to stress, try to unsettle you. If you are a young, intelligent man do not work here. You may think it is a real workplace, but as you see more of the tests, the steady revolving door as they evaluate people, you'll realize, yeah, this facility is really a national security front run by the CIA.

  • Ray Collie, Jr.
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Both my parents live here. The faculty has been remodeled. As a nurse myself, I'm happy with the care they receive. It's a great fit for them. Cons- never family focused acvitiies- no Halloween parties, or Christmas parties for the residents.

  • Carol Burns
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I have not been there yet but am seriously considering placing my daughter there and I am getting feelings from everyone's reviews. So, I need to go on Monday and make my own decisions.

About Butler County Care Facility

General Information

Legal Business NameCounty Of Butler
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 16, 2000 (20 years)
Capacity109
Residents97
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Butler County Care Facility

Butler County Care Facility was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 2, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

February 16, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Butler County Care Facility require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.8%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.5%
79.3%
84.4%
54.5%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.6%
34.9%
31.2%
31.0%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.3%
32.5%
27.9%
19.5%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.6%
8.1%
12.0%
9.0%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.5%
23.6%
21.3%
25.4%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
11.8%
9.9%
13.0%
15.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7%
3.4%
2.2%
9.4%
7.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
4.3%
4.7%
2.1%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
29.8%
30.0%
24.8%
37.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
8.0%
5.6%
1.2%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
1.1%
0.0%
2.3%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
1.1%
1.8%
1.6%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

56.0%
67.4%
59.3%
41.7%
86.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.3%
69.8%
69.8%
69.8%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
65.2%
45.0%
70.0%
60.0%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places