Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Hilliard
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sammy Nicol
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This place is great! They have awesome nurses and administrater is just amazing! Great nursing home

  • Rob Ridlehoover
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Darby Glen recently provided my 87 year old mother with the best rehab experience she has ever had. Sadly, she has been in 3 rehabs over the last two years and Darby Glen was exceptional in every way. Her first rehab experience was a great facility, so so staff. The second was great staff, not so great facility. Darby was great in every way, facility, staff, room, food, and response to family. I cannot stress enough how worry free her stay was. It was the first rehab experience where I did not receive a call from my mother complaining about something and wanting to go home. Hopefully our rehab days are over but if they are not, I would not hesitate for a second to have her return to Darby Glen. I cannot recommend them enough.

  • Lisa Cuttitta
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    We had a lot of issues with this facility. My father was only at the facility for a few days and had to be transported back to the hospital because he had a blood sugar level of 27 and was unresponsive. Then the PT department broke his knee as they did not listen to him when he said he could not do an exercise. It took several days for them to even get an x-ray done on the knee. It may be a good facility if you need someplace to live out the rest of your life and you do not have any medical needs. But I would not recommend them.

  • Tony Rice
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    This place is a joke I know people that work here and I wouldn't send any of my family or friends to this place!!!! The employees all have sexual intercourse while on the job.. there are some residents that don't get their diapers changed at all in a day sad that the state is to dumb to catch on to this

  • Kortney Anders
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

About Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHilliard Health & Rehabilitation Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 10, 2010 (7 years)
Capacity110
Residents93
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 15, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Receive registry verification that a nurse aide has met the required training and skills that the State requires; and 2) ensure nurse aides receive the required retraining after 24 months if nursing related services were not provided for monetary compe
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionUpon the death of a resident, convey the residents personal funds and an accounting of those funds to the appropriate party.

August 23, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

June 12, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,720 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.0%
91.8%
91.8%
91.8%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
98.5%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
18.2%
25.0%
27.0%
34.4%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
15.3%
11.5%
8.9%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.6%
13.1%
8.5%
14.1%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.0%
13.6%
12.7%
12.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
8.3%
4.2%
4.8%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.0%
7.3%
8.6%
8.5%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4%
12.5%
12.9%
12.9%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.1%
4.3%
2.9%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
95.2%
94.0%
92.1%
86.8%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
1.4%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
3.0%
4.2%
2.8%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
0.0%
1.6%
2.8%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.4%
96.5%
99.5%
97.2%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.8%
91.2%
91.2%
91.2%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
13.1%
15.8%
25.4%
30.3%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
40.4%
30.8%
16.7%
22.0%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.9%
1.9%
0.7%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places