Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Arbors At Mifflin

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Mansfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Brandon Cox
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    I met the art director Kim today. Sweet women. I can tell she is a caring person.

  • Bev Rosich
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My father-in-law became a resident at Arbors of Mifflin after suffering a fall last Christmas Eve. He was near blind and suffering from dementia, but was still a character as he had been his entire life. The staff at Mifflin in the dementia wing are to be commended...they were very patient, caring and attentive to him, treating him with respect until he passed away in March. I made regular visits to Mifflin and got to know the facility and staff prior to his admission as well as other facilities through my job in home health. This helped tremendously in making the decision to move him to Mansfield from Columbiana County and eased the transition. Everyone from nursing, social services and financial offices were great to work with. I would recommend them....

  • Lisa Saal
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I can't express enough what a great experience this transition has been for my mother, myself and my sister. Each person I have had contact with has made me feel comfortable and welcome. Mindi in Admissions is an absolute gem. Kelly and Howard in the Alzheimer's wing are a true blessing.... and we shouldn't leave out the aides in the wing who are so sweet and patient with Mom. Also, a shout out to Annette who has answered my many phone calls with such a pleasant voice. We haven't had a great experience so far with other facilities. Now that Mom is there at Arbors, I can feel comfortable in knowing that she will be checked on frequently, that the staff will make sure her oxygen tank is working correctly, and that they will help to bathe her and keep her dry. I am certain we did the right thing by transferring her there. That is a great feeling, believe me. I am so grateful for all of the staff for making our lives a little better! Sent from my iPhone

  • Mindi Brinegar
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I have worked at the Arbors at Mifflin for 18 years. I am proud to be a part of such a great team. A team who shows compassion on a day to day basis.

  • Ronald Stark
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Both of my parents are residents at Arbors and yesterday was their 63rd wedding anniversary. The staff prepared a cake for them and facilitated this recognition in the Bird room with the other residents. My parent's were deeply moved and it pleases me to know that they are caring for them.

About Arbors At Mifflin

General Information

Legal Business NameMansfield Opco, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 13, 1989 (28 years)
Capacity99
Residents91
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Arbors At Mifflin

Arbors At Mifflin
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 3, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

June 16, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

September 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Arbors At Mifflin require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.8%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.7%
100.0%
98.7%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
38.9%
40.6%
58.6%
51.9%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.7%
35.0%
28.7%
35.2%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.5%
16.7%
23.3%
13.7%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.9%
12.2%
13.5%
18.2%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.6%
21.3%
18.4%
25.4%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.3%
19.5%
16.7%
25.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3%
10.6%
7.0%
6.6%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
10.5%
9.4%
0.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
7.4%
2.7%
1.4%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9%
4.7%
4.7%
7.9%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
2.3%
2.3%
3.9%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.0%
8.6%
7.6%
1.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
1.3%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

82.4%
80.6%
93.0%
93.7%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.4%
76.1%
76.1%
76.1%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.8%
67.7%
63.4%
37.5%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
23.2%
23.8%
27.5%
20.0%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
2.2%
2.7%
3.7%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
2.1%
2.1%
0.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places