Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Arbors At Minerva

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Minerva
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kris Idone
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I just cannot say enough good things about this care center. The staff has been there forever, the care is compassionate and really follows through on any issue which arises. The food Is GREAT! The administrator is involved and very caring. If I had to place a family member, I would not hesitate to trust this team. Thank you to Arbors at Minerva for being an example for others to follow!

  • Stacie Russell
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I am the Admissions Care Transition Coordinator for the Arbors. Every day I visit patients in the hospital that are anxious about short term rehabilitation centers. I can tell you that you will be pleasantly surprised by our gracious, caring staff at the Arbors at Minerva. Your rehab plan will be discussed with you and your family upon admission. Your goals will be clear and your recovery will be our #1 goal. Before you leave, our team will help you coordinate any further assistance you will need when you return home. Please feel to take a tour and see the Arbors difference for yourself!

  • Shelly Dotts
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Clean, friendly helpful staff, nicest nursing home I've ever been to.

  • Debra Rininger
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I have worked at Arbors at Minerva for 23 years and I love working there. The residents are well taken care of and loved by the caring staff. I have had several family members that have been residents there and all were happy with the care that they received.

  • William Pietrowsky
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Arbors at Minerva has an extremely knowledgeable staff and very caring people. My wife and I live in Michigan and my mother lives in Ohio between Minerva and Malvern. she had a medical issue recently and was hospitalized and we had to find A medical facility that could provide assistance for my 90-year-old mother's remainder of her life. We are extremely fortunate that we found the Arbors at minerva. Their knowledge and caring manner actually made What could have been a very difficult situation a pleasant event. Lisa is an outstanding administrator who helped us through the transition.

About Arbors At Minerva

General Information

Legal Business NameMinerva Opco, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 11, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity95
Residents52
Percent Occupied55%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Arbors At Minerva

Arbors At Minerva
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 28, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

May 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,275 fine
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Arbors At Minerva require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.0%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.0%
34.6%
-
-
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.2%
41.3%
40.5%
46.2%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.3%
19.4%
25.8%
24.9%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.0%
9.1%
10.8%
10.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7%
22.7%
16.7%
31.6%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
27.5%
16.4%
15.3%
20.5%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
6.2%
2.4%
4.7%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
8.7%
0.0%
10.0%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
4.2%
0.0%
4.7%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.0%
6.0%
4.8%
4.7%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.6%
96.1%
98.0%
98.0%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.3%
94.1%
94.1%
94.1%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.2%
66.7%
68.3%
70.8%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
41.2%
32.3%
37.5%
31.0%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
3.4%
3.4%
2.9%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places