Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurels Of Mt Vernon The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Mount Vernon
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Shirley Hughes
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I am very disappointed in the care given recently to a close relative. Apparently there are no procedures for new patients . . . because something as simple as a menu never made it from the patient room to the kitchen. When my relative first arrived, he was in three different beds and two different rooms because the electric beds would not work. He was on Oxygen and the concentrator he was using also would not work in the receptacle near the bed, so it had to be plugged in across the room and this provided a tripping hazard for anyone coming into the room. I will never recommend this facility. Their marketing is excellent . . too bad the facility doesn't live up to the marketing. And, I just learned one more fact. My relative had orders when he arrived for an appointment with his surgeon for clamp removal tomorrow. The appointment had to be cancelled because the nurse either refused or neglected to make the appointment with the ambulance and now they are booked and cannot make the trip. This whole mess has been reported to the Ohio Dept. of Health, and I am contacting the Ohio Attorney General's office tomorrow morning about the elder abuse and neglect laws that are in effect. Things have to change in the case of our senior citizens.

  • marcia hurlow
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My mother went there after surgery. It was a fairly institutional, sterile place, but she got good care.

  • Mary Stafford
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Laurels Of Mt Vernon The

General Information

Legal Business NameOak Health Care Investors Of Mt Vernon, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 1978 (39 years)
Capacity109
Residents78
Percent Occupied72%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurels Of Mt Vernon The

Laurels Of Mt Vernon The
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

July 7, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurels Of Mt Vernon The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 60min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.0%
75.3%
75.3%
75.3%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9%
92.1%
93.2%
93.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.1%
61.9%
58.6%
58.3%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9%
22.0%
23.6%
24.0%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.4%
13.4%
9.7%
9.7%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.6%
18.6%
12.7%
15.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.9%
8.9%
1.9%
6.1%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2%
5.5%
13.9%
22.1%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5%
9.7%
10.2%
14.0%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7%
8.1%
8.9%
5.4%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
4.3%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
7.9%
5.1%
5.3%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2%
4.6%
1.4%
1.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

87.9%
91.1%
92.6%
92.1%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.7%
85.6%
85.6%
85.6%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.1%
61.7%
68.2%
71.2%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
45.1%
35.8%
33.0%
37.6%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
4.4%
5.3%
1.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.8%
4.4%
1.3%
0.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places