Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Assumption Village The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. North Lima
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    Do not send your loved ones to this facility. They staff is rude, uncaring and unkind. There are some nurses aids there that were wonderful but overall the experience was awful.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Made me aware of somethings that the hospital missed. Staff is nice and always ready to help.. My dad says that he likes it.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Don't put your loved ones in this home. The employees are crass, disrespectful, and uncaring. What kind of a person could steal from a 75 year old lady? I really feel sorry for anyone who has live here.

  • ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Treat patients very well

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Friendly

About Assumption Village The

General Information

Legal Business NameAssumption Village
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 22, 1990 (28 years)
Capacity150
Residents139
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Assumption Village The

Assumption Village The
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Assumption Village The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
42.9%
45.9%
36.4%
51.8%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.9%
19.6%
20.6%
19.5%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.3%
12.7%
7.6%
7.7%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.8%
14.7%
17.9%
14.1%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.0%
18.8%
16.0%
19.0%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.5%
4.4%
4.6%
1.7%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4%
6.2%
7.3%
9.3%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.0%
4.0%
3.1%
3.1%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
5.7%
5.9%
2.3%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
3.9%
3.2%
3.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
4.6%
3.2%
0.8%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
1.0%
3.4%
2.9%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
99.2%
99.1%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.0%
57.3%
66.7%
69.2%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
34.0%
23.7%
20.2%
18.9%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.0%
2.4%
1.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places