Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Briarfield Manor

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Youngstown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Edith Spencer
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Nice place. Could do without the whiny union though.

  • Delta Emerald
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father has been there for three years only to be used for his medical insurance,and Social security income. The staff hangs around the hallways like everyone is taken care of, but the majority of the residents are left in their rooms with feces and soiled themselves,and the staff still doesn't care hours later. The head of nursing ,and the owners are nowhere to be found when you need someone to talk to about anything. My dad was "perfectly healthy" in the beginningDecember but on the 28th they shipped him to St.Elizabeth s without notifying my family. He was there two days until we finally got a call from ST.Elizabeth's saying what kind of condition he is in. He had a severe pneumonia that affected his heart and he had a treak down his throat to help him breathe. DR.Shaw Briarfields Dr.,had released him early only so they could take my father's medical insurance for (rehab/therapy).Again we didn't get any call from the hospital when my dad was released, but Briarfield called 5 hours later at 8:11pm saying he's been here. The frustration of not knowing that your loved one is safe,or where they are is horrendous. My mother was terrified of losing him and all they did was argue. Not to mention that the doctor checked him that month and claims he didn't find pneumonia in him. I would never wish this nightmare of a hell hole on anyone. These people need to shape up because there putting lives in danger just as it is. Residents if you are reading contact your family have them read this, at least you won't have to be taken advantage of anymore. Briarfield takes all of the resident's social security,and any personal savings from them.

  • RONALD LEWIS
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    I am an resident of the Briarfield Manor. The words I am putting down are of my own opinion and concern. To the ownership of the manor others and myself would like it if, you gave the workers some credit for what they do instead of working them like they are robots. Give the nurses a BREAK also. They are human and sometimes humans get overwhelmed with work and, it can lead to stress, mistakes and leaving the job earlier than she/he wants to never mind the consequences. As an resident I truly feel for all the employees. So i'm thanking you in advance Mrs Reese for your swift handling of these matters. Mr. Ronald E. Lewis President of Resident Council

  • Nina Love
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Horrible place the owners care about your $$$ they do not care about the clients or their Nursing Aids they treat them like crap even when they try to make it to work in storm rain snow and all weather severe conditions. Ungrateful Managers and owners.?

  • Kelley Diamond
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

About Briarfield Manor

General Information

Legal Business NameEdj LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 28, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity116
Residents105
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Briarfield Manor

Briarfield Manor was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 11, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

July 16, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

March 17, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Briarfield Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 5min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
93.0%
93.0%
93.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
98.5%
98.5%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
27.3%
28.6%
-
-
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.0%
19.4%
12.9%
13.3%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.9%
24.8%
28.8%
7.9%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.8%
21.9%
10.9%
13.6%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.5%
20.3%
15.3%
10.7%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.5%
3.9%
1.8%
5.1%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.6%
13.4%
10.3%
7.7%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
7.5%
3.8%
1.9%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
14.3%
14.5%
27.1%
21.9%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.7%
6.0%
11.8%
12.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
7.4%
4.4%
6.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
8.1%
5.5%
5.9%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.8%
96.2%
86.8%
79.8%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
56.7%
56.7%
56.7%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.2%
72.9%
61.7%
62.1%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.9%
3.4%
3.6%
4.9%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5%
2.9%
2.4%
1.9%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places