Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Oaks At Bethesda The

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Ohio
  3. Zanesville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • donna gleckler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I visited my brother here many times while he lived during his rehabilatation. He was a resident once after a stroke and once after surgery. The staff is efficient and professional. The rooms and public areas were always clean and comfortable.

  • Jim Haren
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My Mother Bertha Haren has been a resident here at the Oaks for 2 years and has been treated wonderful I am very pleased with the care of Mother I could not have chosen a better place

  • connie Gilliland
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    It's under staffed. Some Tech's really don't want to be there. Or don't like their job. Incident's happen , but no reports. Patient afraid to tell what happened. I wouldn't put anyone in this facility. My father's teeth and glasses came up missing . And yet they brought a regular menu . He even missed a couple meals. Said they bring something different and never returned. The Dr ordered his foot to be wrapped daily, and wasn't done until the end of his stay. We tried to get him moved and were waiting on a call, next thing we know they packed him up and had him sign himself out and moved him and the new facility wasn't ready and he had no room. I wouldn't give this place any stars. Nor would I recommend this facility to anyone. Looks nice but not good.

  • Gary Golden
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother just loves the place, The Oaks is very well though out and is a great place for your loved ones.

  • goldieelaine456@gmail com william1974
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Nice people

About Oaks At Bethesda The

General Information

Legal Business NameTrilogy Healthcare Of Muskingum Ii, LLC.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 7, 2013 (5 years)
Capacity55
Residents49
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Oaks At Bethesda The

Oaks At Bethesda The was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 4, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$8,775 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

July 21, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

May 25, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.

April 24, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.

March 3, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Oaks At Bethesda The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.4%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
34.4%
39.3%
25.8%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.3%
20.7%
13.7%
11.6%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.7%
21.1%
24.2%
26.5%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3%
24.1%
11.1%
20.0%
15.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
0.0%
7.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.9%
13.3%
7.7%
3.8%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
7.7%
5.3%
5.4%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.8%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
4.5%
2.0%
2.1%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.9%
94.5%
96.5%
100.0%
86.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.6%
87.8%
87.8%
87.8%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.1%
78.3%
80.6%
70.8%
66.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.6%
18.9%
14.3%
12.5%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.4%
3.3%
1.8%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places