Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Plantation Village Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Oklahoma (OK)
  4. Altus
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

About Plantation Village Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameAltus Operations, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 13, 2006 (11 years)
Capacity158
Residents74
Percent Occupied47%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Plantation Village Nursing Center

Plantation Village Nursing Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Oklahoma Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

February 3, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

January 16, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Plantation Village Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.0%
68.3%
68.3%
68.3%
94.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
90.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.4%
48.6%
62.2%
59.5%
33.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.7%
38.5%
35.3%
29.6%
29.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.6%
15.3%
15.5%
17.4%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.1%
14.5%
20.4%
22.8%
20.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
13.7%
16.0%
16.7%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.1%
10.4%
23.6%
22.5%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
5.5%
18.9%
25.0%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
7.7%
3.3%
7.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
5.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
3.6%
5.6%
8.8%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
3.4%
2.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.0%
99.1%
99.1%
85.3%
77.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
26.9%
20.9%
20.9%
20.9%
71.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.9%
88.2%
89.7%
-
61.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
41.6%
42.6%
23.1%
30.8%
24.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7%
2.3%
2.4%
2.7%
2.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places