Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Country Club Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Oklahoma (OK)
  4. Duncan
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Great nursing home

About Country Club Care

General Information

Legal Business NameKanakuk, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 30, 2005 (13 years)
Capacity104
Residents88
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Country Club Care

Country Club Care
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Oklahoma Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 7, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

February 4, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintUse a registered nurse at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.

November 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

March 2, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Country Club Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
1hr 55min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
5min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
3hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
98.8%
97.6%
98.8%
90.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
12.0%
10.2%
10.6%
4.3%
33.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.8%
50.0%
52.6%
53.1%
29.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.9%
3.0%
6.4%
3.8%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.4%
17.7%
24.7%
20.5%
20.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
10.8%
7.7%
6.3%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.7%
25.1%
17.4%
16.3%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
3.8%
1.2%
4.8%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
7.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
14.1%
14.5%
15.3%
11.5%
5.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.7%
15.2%
17.3%
16.7%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2%
6.2%
3.7%
4.8%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
3.0%
1.5%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
97.1%
91.7%
77.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.5%
65.5%
65.5%
65.5%
71.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
-
-
-
24.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5%
-
-
-
2.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places