Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Tulsa Jewish Retirement Community And Hc Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Oklahoma (OK)
  4. Tulsa
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Morris Odioko
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Decent environment, massive swimming pool. Adequate parking space.

  • Randy Alman
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Excellent care facilities

  • Esther Miles
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Give great care for their residents.

  • Melanie Fletcher
    ★★★★★ 5 years ago

    felt very welcome, the campus is huge and kept in good condition

  • BRIDGET CLARK
    ★★★★★ a month ago

About Tulsa Jewish Retirement Community And Hc Center

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement And Health Care Center Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 15, 2011 (6 years)
Capacity58
Residents57
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Tulsa Jewish Retirement Community And Hc Center

Tulsa Jewish Retirement Community And Hc Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Oklahoma Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 15, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.

July 31, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Tulsa Jewish Retirement Community And Hc Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr 5min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 55min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

87.0%
90.6%
90.6%
90.6%
94.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.8%
91.8%
96.0%
96.1%
90.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
33.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7%
26.3%
26.3%
29.7%
29.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
29.8%
16.2%
40.1%
28.6%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.2%
10.2%
10.0%
7.8%
20.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.4%
6.1%
22.6%
35.5%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.4%
8.0%
13.8%
13.7%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.4%
10.2%
4.0%
2.0%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9%
5.4%
0.0%
4.7%
7.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
19.1%
8.7%
6.4%
5.9%
5.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.3%
4.1%
6.0%
14.0%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1%
6.1%
2.0%
3.9%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
3.0%
4.0%
4.4%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.9%
84.2%
91.2%
94.1%
77.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.5%
91.9%
91.9%
91.9%
71.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.7%
10.3%
7.1%
11.5%
24.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3%
3.8%
4.2%
0.0%
2.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.3%
5.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OK
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places