Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rose Villa Senior Living Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Oregon (OR)
  4. Milwaukie
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    i waited 13 months for unit 4104 to be constructed. i moved in at 8:10pm on 7/7/16. the transitions director handed me the key. last i saw of her although i had met her in june, 2015 when i got to choose upgrades: paint colors, flooring, cabinets, appliances, fireplace, etc. at that time she told me that a double stainless steel sink was my only option i told her i didn't want stainless steel or a double sink. my next door neighbor actually yelled at her and was able to get a single sink. another resident screamed at her because she lied and told the resident her unit had a yard...it didn't. after waiting 13 months and paying $312,147 for the 'registration fee' and upgrades, the apartment is a rectangle with a galley kitchen, a miniscule west facing patio without a roof (unusable because of the heat and rain), a lowflow toilet that almost never flushes clean, a thermostat that has malfunctioned since day one, etc, etc, etc. i have filled out hundreds(?) of work orders for repairs for unsuitable conditions. supposed to hear back within 24 hours. many work orders are never fulfilled or mentioned. forced to resubmit until someone takes notice. 99% of the 170+ staff members are respectful and competent. 99% of the residents are respectful and/or friendly. if it weren't for the registration fee, you might want to consider living here, but until that is no longer required, please look elsewhere...anywhere with no registration fee! my unit is fit for a guest room but not a full time residence.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My family has lived at Rose Villa since it was first built way back when. One elderly aunt still resides there. The healthcare people in the care center are fabulous. The ONLY drawback is the food. It has NEVER been good. Not ever. Not since grandma first moved in

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My great grandma lives here and it's surprisingly nice, can't wait to see how all the remodelling turns out.

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Fabulous.the people ars just lovely;)

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Rose Villa Senior Living Community

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 31, 2012 (5 years)
Capacity45
Residents37
Percent Occupied82%
Program ParticipationMedicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rose Villa Senior Living Community

Rose Villa Senior Living Community
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Oregon Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 12, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

June 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

March 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rose Villa Senior Living Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 50min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
30min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 20min
3hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
92.7%
92.7%
92.7%
92.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7%
75.7%
94.1%
93.9%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
42.9%
-
-
25.0%
50.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.1%
6.7%
6.7%
10.7%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.1%
35.1%
15.4%
3.8%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.7%
10.8%
11.8%
9.4%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.6%
23.3%
17.2%
25.0%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.2%
18.8%
8.2%
12.8%
12.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
8.1%
8.8%
9.1%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
4.2%
-
4.8%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
3.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
5.4%
0.0%
9.1%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3%
5.4%
5.9%
0.0%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.4%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
78.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
68.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
22.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places