Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Oregon (OR)
  4. Tigard
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City

General Information

Legal Business NameKing City Rehab, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 1, 1976 (41 years)
Capacity148
Residents77
Percent Occupied52%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City

Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Oregon Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 2, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

December 22, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

84.0%
88.7%
88.7%
88.7%
92.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.7%
81.6%
85.4%
86.4%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
45.0%
-
50.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.0%
23.3%
22.0%
10.3%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
29.7%
8.5%
22.5%
19.4%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.9%
10.4%
12.8%
2.4%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
16.7%
12.2%
10.8%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
12.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4%
10.4%
8.5%
11.6%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
4.8%
2.4%
5.4%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
2.6%
2.5%
2.6%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
12.2%
6.2%
4.5%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3%
2.0%
2.1%
4.5%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.0%
7.7%
5.5%
3.6%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

66.9%
67.1%
68.1%
73.5%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.8%
69.3%
69.3%
69.3%
78.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.0%
58.9%
71.1%
80.1%
68.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.5%
21.4%
16.5%
11.4%
22.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
3.0%
2.9%
2.2%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened