Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cedarbrook Nursing Homes

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Allentown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lynn S.
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This nursing home gives minimal car to the residents. When patients are on a pureed diet with thickened liquids. Little to no training is done to teach nursing staff and aids how that needs to be done in a correct manor. Also, when patients are dealing with dementia good training needs to be done with nursing staff and aids on how to deal with these types of patients. I have not seen physical abuse at this facility; but, I have witnessed verbal abuse. Again, training of staff is so important on how a patient needs to be treated and what is considered abuse when nursing staff and aids interact with dementia patients. I have also come into my brothers room and found an over-powering smell of urine. What was sad was he had just been served breakfast under these horrible conditions. I have come into his room at noon and found again the strong smell of urine, his bed not changed or made up, I found him in the dining that day and he had a bad smell about him. Many of his personal items have gone missing. They were not expensive items; but, some had great sentimental value to him and the family. It is so discouraged to see how nursing home facilities often treat the very weak of our society. They have no voice, other than family trying to get better care for these patients. I know funding is a major issue and they get what society is willing to contribute. Cedarbrook is in very bad disrepair, also. The place is very depressing to visit. I have not seen things improve under Good Shepherd managing it; if anything, things have gotten worse.

  • Tanor Faux
    ★★★★★ a month ago

  • Kim Glenn
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

About Cedarbrook Nursing Homes

General Information

Legal Business NameCounty Of Lehigh Pennsylvania
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1980 (38 years)
Capacity670
Residents626
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cedarbrook Nursing Homes

Cedarbrook Nursing Homes
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 9, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.

September 16, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

January 29, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cedarbrook Nursing Homes require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.4%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.6%
94.0%
95.3%
99.3%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
47.2%
52.6%
47.5%
45.8%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9%
23.4%
23.7%
25.7%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.8%
22.5%
20.9%
20.4%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
18.7%
17.9%
17.2%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
18.7%
16.5%
15.8%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.8%
6.3%
8.0%
4.7%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
6.7%
6.5%
6.7%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.3%
2.9%
2.8%
2.7%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.2%
5.7%
4.6%
4.1%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
2.9%
3.4%
2.2%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
3.8%
3.7%
4.1%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
3.1%
2.9%
3.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.6%
2.2%
2.5%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

62.8%
68.9%
76.7%
84.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
80.5%
80.5%
80.5%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.2%
70.4%
62.9%
64.2%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.0%
23.0%
22.1%
18.4%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
5.1%
2.7%
2.3%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places