Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Broomall Presbyterian Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Broomall Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lizegc .
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    My dad has lived here for 5+ years. Even with the change over the staff thankfully has stayed rather consistent. The wing staff and dining room staff are so caring and I've seen them take the time to make things right. I would like to see one or two additional staff on the wing, the clients are labor intensive and I don't want to see the staff leave or get worn out. In my opinion standards have improved since the change of hands.

  • Diane Beresford
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Clean and tidy no doubt. I'm having some difficult time adjusting to facility but not sure what I'm missing. Staff is great and help as much as they can.

  • Karen Garbutt
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My Mom has been at Rosewood Gardens formerly Broomall Presbyterian for two years. The facility is always very clean and the staff is very nice. My mom is treated very well. I'm there multiple times a week and feel very confident of the excellent care that my mom receives.

  • Rich Schiffer
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I have visited friends and family in many different care facilities. Rosewood Gardens stands out as being one of the best. Clean, friendly, pleasant environment with staff that are caring and courteous.

  • Nicole Arganetto
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Rosewood took such great care of my grandmom who had dementia! They were all so amazing! Special shout out to Donna, her nurse. She always went above and beyond. She was more of a friend to my family with the way she cared for my grandmom. Everyone is always so friendly and kind. They all say hello when you walk in the door. It's a great place!

About Broomall Presbyterian Village

General Information

Legal Business NamePhila. Presbytery Homes, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity146
Residents125
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Broomall Presbyterian Village

Broomall Presbyterian Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 26, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Broomall Presbyterian Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.0%
86.5%
88.8%
89.2%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.0%
69.7%
73.9%
70.8%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.5%
21.1%
20.4%
18.9%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.9%
15.6%
21.5%
17.6%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.3%
9.6%
13.1%
14.4%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8%
12.4%
11.1%
10.8%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.3%
14.6%
12.5%
10.9%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.0%
3.1%
12.0%
9.1%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.1%
8.7%
9.7%
9.7%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.9%
5.0%
1.0%
1.9%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8%
8.7%
3.8%
4.5%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
6.7%
5.6%
4.5%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.5%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

69.0%
79.6%
84.7%
91.2%
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.8%
84.1%
84.1%
84.1%
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.9%
62.1%
54.0%
61.0%
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.7%
12.1%
31.9%
27.5%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
1.9%
2.2%
1.1%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
1.2%
1.0%
0.5%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places