Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Canonsburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kimberley Kirksey
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I've been an employee here for many years! It's a wonderful place to work. We here at the Greenery take pride in what we do. We love and care for all our residents, and we are one big happy family!

  • Jennifer Bolinger
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Awful! Please do not send your loved ones here! The quality of care is poor, and the staff are uneducated. My husband went here for IV antibiotics and rehab to walk again. None of the nurses have yet to figure out how to use my husband's IV machine! The physical therapist and occupational therapist seem to be the only qualified people in the building. The food is awful. Prisoners eat better than the patients in here. The smell is awful! It smells of feces and urine up and down the hallways. God forbid you push the button for your nurse. You will die before they ever come to check on you. Patients are screaming "HELP" all the time without being helped. The administration staff, especially the social worker and supervisor are rude. When we asked for help to transfer my husband to home care, they acted like we were putting them out, and they would get around to it when they could...It's their job to be there and advocate for the patient. Please, I beg you if you love your loved ones, please don't put them in here. Their mental state will decline as well as their physical.

  • beth nicholson
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I found this facility to be one of the nicest in the area. the rehab areas are large and well equipped, not to mention the staff, rehab and nursing , is patient and very knowledgeable. Food is really good! If you haven't been there recently, it's well worth revisiting because new management is making a lot of positive improvements.

  • Mark Naas
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My wife spent 2 weeks at the Greenery after a month in the hospital. I was impressed with the staff and how quickly they weaned her down on her oxygen requirements. They got her going in therapy and she quickly regained some strength and stability. Her meds were properly administered. The staff were all professional and seemed nice and caring. The facility was somewhat dated, but was clean and the food appeared decent. I would not hesitate to put my wife back in there if the need arose.

  • Mor Leibler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom was a resident at the Greenery Center for Rehab last month, the staff are so warm and friendly, excellent nurses. the residents are so relaxed and happy, always Good activities and fun, the food was so delicious like restaurants style. I would recommend everyone that needs a rehab or long term care place should go to Greenery Center.

About Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 26, 1985 (33 years)
Capacity140
Residents82
Percent Occupied59%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing

Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 2, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep clinical record information safe.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive or get specialized rehabilitative services per the patient's assessment or plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEncode each residents assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssess in a timely manner the resident when the resident enters the nursing home.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide proof that residents' personal money that is deposited with the nursing home is secure.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionHave enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.

October 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

July 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintOperate and provide services according to Federal, State, and local laws and professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that the facility is administered in an acceptable way that maintains the well-being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

June 24, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$4,000 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 5min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

87.7%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
47.6%
38.1%
-
37.5%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4%
29.9%
25.4%
22.2%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
34.4%
54.5%
27.6%
9.8%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.2%
15.6%
23.6%
21.7%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.0%
23.7%
14.3%
7.7%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
2.6%
4.6%
2.3%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
1.4%
6.5%
8.7%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
6.1%
5.0%
4.5%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.8%
16.1%
8.8%
6.3%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
1.4%
1.6%
2.9%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.2%
98.1%
97.1%
98.6%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.8%
84.9%
84.9%
84.9%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
38.7%
35.4%
47.9%
33.1%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.9%
15.4%
4.3%
1.9%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places