Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Greenleaf Nursing Home And Con

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Doylestown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Greenleaf Nursing Home And Con

General Information

Legal Business NameGreenleaf Nursing And Convalescent Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity130
Residents127
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Greenleaf Nursing Home And Con

Greenleaf Nursing Home And Con
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 18, 2016 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

October 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

March 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

November 20, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.

October 2, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.

September 11, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Greenleaf Nursing Home And Con require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.7%
92.2%
92.2%
92.2%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.3%
67.2%
67.5%
66.7%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
24.5%
16.9%
15.8%
16.4%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9%
24.3%
25.2%
23.6%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
29.4%
34.3%
39.6%
28.8%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.3%
27.1%
26.4%
31.4%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.7%
37.0%
36.4%
23.8%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.4%
7.4%
8.0%
7.7%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8%
13.8%
9.3%
11.3%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
3.8%
3.4%
3.2%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.6%
6.1%
8.1%
6.7%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9%
4.2%
2.5%
1.7%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3%
5.7%
4.1%
6.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9%
1.6%
0.8%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

18.6%
12.2%
20.0%
22.4%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.1%
34.1%
34.1%
34.1%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.7%
5.0%
-
-
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.8%
5.0%
-
4.8%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
1.9%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened