Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Dresher Hill Health And Rehab

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Fort Washington Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cindy Moffitt
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I want to share what a fabulous experience I've had in only 1 weeks time. My Mom has been to 7 different facilities in a 3 year time span due to neglect. Having dementia I'm her advocate. Every staff member has gone above and beyond here. We've been to the so called dementia specialty facility's with the red carpet so don't be fooled by the decor. If there was a 10 star rating they would have my vote. Thanks for letting me sleep at night.

  • Alexandra Carides
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My mother is a resident of Dresher Hill for about a month now. She has been surrounded by professional care and attention and her needs are taken care of in a prompt fashion. The personnel at Dresher Hill is very competent. Whether I talked to a medical professional or business representative: the attention to detail and the knowledge about rehabilitation and Nursing Home were impressive. And, last but not at all least, I found that people employed at Dresher Hill care. They care about doing their work correct, and they care about their residents.

  • E Qadir Martin
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    At my recent visit with my relative I ask the nurses station to send someone to come clean him up because he soiled himself. No one came for the entire hour even though I made the request several times. Lousy service

  • B Pugliese
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Would rate neg 10 if i could arrived here to a bed that was supposed to be ordered and it wasnt roomate bed had urine stain on it watched nurse make bed without cleaning it refused to stay.there own employees told me its a dump they ended up throwing me out ended up in jefferson ..hospital for dyhration 36 hrs no food and drink .also residents line the hall ways no food or drink

  • michael oldenbergh
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Place sucks. Got a call from them said my dad has 104 fever they took him to Einstein.Called them he was not there. Called Dresher Hill no one answer the phone ,called 5 times, my sister called no answer either finally she found out he was sent to Abington. Incompandent staff and care, how let my father get a fever that high.This is 2nd time that happen. Also second time he had a kidney infection,because they not cleaning him properly.Like to move him , but no other place will take him because he ran out of money and only has his social security and a small pension left. The better care places in the area want 50 grand a year and up.

About Dresher Hill Health And Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameOak Hrc Dresher Hill LLC
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 15, 1981 (38 years)
Capacity118
Residents110
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Dresher Hill Health And Rehab

Dresher Hill Health And Rehab was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 15, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.

August 28, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 7, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Dresher Hill Health And Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.2%
96.0%
92.2%
90.5%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
36.7%
38.8%
38.1%
43.9%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.6%
24.0%
21.4%
22.2%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.9%
31.3%
21.7%
18.5%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.7%
25.6%
27.3%
23.1%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.0%
14.1%
13.8%
8.2%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.1%
9.1%
5.0%
4.8%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1%
11.3%
8.0%
12.2%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
2.6%
1.7%
1.6%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
0.0%
3.2%
1.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
3.0%
1.0%
1.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
2.0%
2.9%
3.8%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.5%
0.8%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

72.7%
60.9%
52.5%
52.3%
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.0%
62.5%
62.5%
62.5%
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
76.1%
-
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.0%
2.9%
3.1%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places