Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Gardens At Orangeville, The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Orangeville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Gardens At Orangeville, The

General Information

Legal Business NameMaybrook- P Orangeville Opco LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1993 (24 years)
Capacity120
Residents115
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Gardens At Orangeville, The

Gardens At Orangeville, The
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 15, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

June 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get specialized rehabilitative services per the patient's assessment or plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for each resident in a way that maintains or improves their quality of life.

May 8, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$41,438 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Gardens At Orangeville, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
97.8%
95.0%
96.0%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.2%
52.0%
54.7%
57.4%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.1%
18.9%
19.2%
15.2%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.3%
14.4%
7.7%
21.0%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.5%
21.8%
19.4%
17.4%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.1%
11.5%
9.4%
5.7%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.8%
1.9%
0.0%
0.8%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
5.7%
4.0%
6.2%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
2.6%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.6%
4.3%
1.1%
0.0%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.3%
4.0%
7.2%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4%
4.3%
4.0%
3.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
1.3%
1.1%
1.1%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1%
1.1%
1.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

86.4%
87.8%
90.6%
79.5%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.0%
87.7%
87.7%
87.7%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.4%
56.7%
70.2%
80.4%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.4%
8.3%
15.8%
8.5%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened