Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kearsley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Philadelphia
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    IT'S ALREADY UNFORTUNATE THAT A LOVED ONE HAS TO BE IN A NURSING HOME. IT'S EVEN MORE UNFORTUNATE WHEN THE STAFF IS ONLY THERE FOR A PAYCHECK. THEY HAVE NO COMPASSION, UNDERSTANDING OR LOVE IN THEIR HEART TO TREAT PEOPLE LIKE THEY ARE HUMAN AND HAVE FEELINGS. I DO NOT LIKE THIS PLACE. THERE ISN'T MUCH TO CHOOSE FROM SO IF YOU DECIDE TO PUT YOUR LOVED ONE IN ANY NURSING HOME, MAKE SURE YOU MAKE YOUR PRESENCE KNOWN.. THEY DON'T EVEN DESERVE 1 STAR

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The owner should also respond to criticism and address issues presented. Silence in this case is not golden!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I brought my friend to Kearsley because another friend's mother had had great treatment there. The staff is caring, and responsive. The rehab section is clean, clean, clean, sparkling. The food is good, tasty if not fabulous,; the meals are balanced, individually chosen (from some list the kitchen must have), the portions generous, and the dining area neatly set up for 4 at a table. This is a rehab unit, so the condition of the patients runs the gamut from unresponsive to totally mentally alert. If your patient needs conversation, talk to one of the nurses about meal-time placement. Your daily presence, even if only for an hour a day, will go a long way toward better care and attention from the aides. (The nurses walk on water. I could name names) The unit itself is noisy (because of so many hard of hearing elders, but doors can be closed. The social work staff (one and a fraction persons) is excellent but severely understaffed. However, what we needed to get done got done.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The place is very nice & CLEAN, BUT..... some of the staff, talks to the patience a little harsh(like the nurses& aids) when they don't think your around.. I personally have heard them. when asking nurse about meds. couldn't answer!! Again the place looks nice & clean... just stay alert, and on top of things, concerning your loved one..... in any nursing hm. .the 4 star is for nursing home .... the Staff is 2

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    Dirty and the staff is RUDE!!!

About Kearsley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameKearsley Operator Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 10, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity84
Residents82
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kearsley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Kearsley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 9, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

December 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kearsley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 60min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.3%
88.1%
88.1%
88.1%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.0%
72.1%
85.4%
81.6%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
67.9%
63.3%
60.9%
65.0%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.6%
8.9%
8.5%
6.4%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.9%
16.3%
16.1%
17.3%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.4%
3.3%
2.1%
2.1%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7%
20.4%
13.0%
14.9%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.8%
8.7%
6.5%
8.6%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.2%
9.8%
8.3%
6.1%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
5.5%
4.7%
4.5%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
9.3%
2.3%
2.2%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.6%
6.2%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
1.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

10.6%
25.8%
42.0%
43.2%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
42.6%
37.6%
37.6%
37.6%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.1%
47.9%
47.9%
57.4%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
23.3%
17.6%
18.2%
21.1%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.7%
1.3%
0.6%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places