Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Philadelphia
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Connie Presser
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    Wesley is a wonderful place for my mother-in-law! Spacious rooms, beautiful garden, and she really enjoys the food and many activities. I highly recommend it!!!!

  • Tasha soto
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    i worked at this facility an i can warn family do not put yr loved ones here !! the call bells will b ignored if the rite staff that do love there jobs aren't there a lot of the aides verbally abuse these residents ignore there calls to use restroom r get showers an wen they do answear call bells they go in the room turn it off an tells the residents they b rite bakk its such a shame wen i worked there the residents loved me as an aide an even if i did not have that section i would still make shore they were good! the residents on the 2nd floor all the way tours the bakk get treated so poorly they close them in wit tables so they won't move ard an they won't have to b after them that is abuse an restraints can not b used an wen u report it they act deaf an do nothin abt it seema &sam r in it for money there heart ain't wit the residents an the nursing supervisor is a drug addict that place is no place for a loved one to b in

  • Natalie Murphy
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Our mother was at the facility for a short time. It was very understaffed. We tested the time it took for someone to answer the call bell at various times when we were there (because our mother said it took a long time for someone) and one time it took 45 minutes. Our mother was able to use the bathroom facilities, but needed help getting there and clearly 45 minutes is too long of a wait. We were also informed that she woke one night with a man standing in her room, but he left when she woke up. Our mother was of 100% sound mind. I would not recommend this facility.

  • Meg St. P
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Looks nice but wouldn't send any relatives. Its all about the money, not the living experience of residents.

  • christina Annarose
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    There all fake they suck unfair don't let your family members go here poor treatment for the elders I would know I worked there.

About Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park

General Information

Legal Business NameEvangelical Manor
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1978 (39 years)
Capacity120
Residents115
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park

Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 16, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

January 13, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

August 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

March 20, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for each resident in a way that maintains or improves their quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.1%
94.6%
94.6%
94.6%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.3%
90.3%
89.1%
90.3%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.5%
67.9%
69.6%
73.1%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
28.4%
26.0%
24.5%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.1%
14.8%
10.9%
15.5%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.6%
7.8%
7.9%
5.9%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.9%
8.7%
12.6%
12.2%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.4%
7.9%
4.4%
4.0%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.1%
12.7%
6.0%
11.8%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6%
7.6%
6.6%
6.1%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.2%
4.0%
3.1%
2.1%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
2.9%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
6.8%
6.9%
7.8%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5%
5.7%
5.1%
4.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

62.9%
63.2%
63.3%
60.6%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.0%
61.3%
61.3%
61.3%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
38.3%
43.3%
47.2%
59.9%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.6%
13.7%
8.8%
6.4%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.8%
3.9%
2.4%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
1.8%
2.5%
1.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places