Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Canterbury Place

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Pittsburgh Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Delainey Cowell
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    although my grandpa being in hospice here was a horrible experience, Jess the nurse made the process a little easier. She was amazing, and so compassionate. She took care of my grandpa with gentleness, and it just gave me a little bit of ease. I loved her and she will always have an impact on me!

  • Patricia McAllister
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My father was in the hospice unit at Canterbury Place and everyone there was very caring and attentive to my dad's needs and care. I will never forget how they took care of him. The RN's, Jessica, Bob, and Barb and all of the nursing staff and Dr. Z. were truly amazing and wonderful to my dad and our family. My family is grateful for all of them during this difficult time in our lives. Thank you for everything. God Bless you all.

  • Michael Loidl
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The Doctors, Nurses, and all Staff members are amazing. Words cannot describe how wonderful everyone cares about the Patients and Families. These Professionals, are the Best at what they do. How they handle and cope with Every detail with kindness and understanding is unbelievable. I can not Thank them enough for Their sincerity in all They do. Thank You Canterbury.

  • Renesmae Sherman
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The nurses are rude when you call in. The rooms are dark and dreary. My friend has been in here for years, I don't know how she copes. Praying for her.

  • Cheryl Williams
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    The caregivers here were fantistic. My mother in law was here for7 mo until she passed. We were so fortunate to have found this place for her. She was well taken care of and loved. We took her favorite poodle, Benny, in to see her often. They were very tolerant and enjoyed having him there. Great place for any loved one in their final days.

About Canterbury Place

General Information

Legal Business NameCanterbury Place
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity115
Residents95
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Canterbury Place

Canterbury Place was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 24, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionUpon the death of a resident, convey the residents personal funds and an accounting of those funds to the appropriate party.

October 18, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

July 12, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

June 24, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Canterbury Place require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
97.5%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.1%
50.0%
51.6%
52.9%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.8%
10.6%
7.6%
6.1%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.8%
28.2%
33.7%
15.6%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.3%
20.8%
14.1%
16.9%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.7%
20.0%
19.7%
24.6%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.0%
6.2%
5.3%
9.5%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
6.7%
6.0%
3.7%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.4%
6.9%
2.4%
4.8%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3%
3.7%
6.7%
1.4%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%
6.2%
8.0%
8.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.8%
96.6%
93.3%
91.1%
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.7%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.3%
65.7%
69.1%
69.3%
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.2%
11.5%
15.8%
17.8%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
2.4%
0.0%
0.8%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places