Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Friendship Village Of South Hi

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Pittsburgh Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • mitch demich
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My father has been at Friendship Village for over 15 years. Until recently all his time was spent in independent living. Coming to live at Friendship Village has turned out to be a wonderful decision. He is always remarking that everyone is so nice. He is now in the health center and still comments to his family how nice everyone is to him. His family appreciates that everyone is so nice and that he is safe and well cared for, especially now that he is in the health center. I highly recommend Friendship Village.

  • Kathleen Bennett
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Friendship Village has been wonderful for my 100-year-old family member. The staff is consistently professional, competent, and--above all--caring. All residents are greeted with respect, by name (Oh, Hello, Mr/Mrs Smith! --not Hi, honey!) and a friendly smile whenever encountered. My relative was assisted in an apartment for ten years, and staff's personal attention and attentiveness to detail enabled his prolonged independence. His recent move to the nursing wing was seamless--he has become stronger and more relaxed since his transfer and is very happy there. I give it my highest recommendation.

  • Michael Tefft
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    We have found Friendship Village to be a true blessing. The staff, facility, meals, activities, support, etc. have all been outstanding. Like many people, we did not know what moving to 'senior living' would be like. But Friendship Village has brought my mother a much richer life than she would have had if she had continued living on her own.

  • Jane S.
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My Grandma was recently in the Health Center and what a great experience she had! I visited a few times and the staff was always friendly and very attentive to her needs. She especially loved the social worker and Patty, saying they went above and beyond when she needed something. Grandma made the right choice when she moved to Friendship Village, they truly treat her as family.

  • Vicki Flotta
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I can't say enough about the care my mother receives in the Health Center at Friendship Village! She is loved and cared for by the staff--from the nurses, to the aides, to the activities and nutrition staffs, to the social worker and admissions staff. Everybody treats her with care and respect. They have filled her later years with purpose and joy. Whenever I have a question or need something, the staff is immediately responsive to my requests and attentive to her needs. Her transition from Independent Living at FV to the Health Center was seamless and we are appreciative of the care she receives there.

About Friendship Village Of South Hi

General Information

Legal Business NameLifespace Communities Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 29, 1985 (34 years)
Capacity89
Residents86
Percent Occupied97%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Friendship Village Of South Hi

Friendship Village Of South Hi was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 26, 2017 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from drugs that restrain them, unless needed for medical treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

September 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Friendship Village Of South Hi require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.4%
70.4%
56.0%
68.2%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.5%
8.6%
10.1%
9.0%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.6%
11.1%
20.1%
17.0%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.8%
10.0%
10.4%
8.6%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.3%
15.9%
14.9%
14.9%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.8%
5.1%
14.3%
16.5%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
9.4%
6.0%
3.6%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
0.0%
3.9%
2.5%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
5.0%
7.8%
9.9%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
2.6%
3.8%
3.3%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.0%
85.0%
90.2%
95.1%
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.3%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
69.7%
-
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.7%
6.7%
13.2%
31.2%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places