Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

John J Kane Regional Center-Sc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Pittsburgh Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Melissa Johnson
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    This is not a nice place it is fifty and dirty and it smells it is not a nice place to put your loved in I wouldn't put my loved in this place they have a female abuser named John rouse working here as a CNA he pretends to be nice but it is a disguise he has had several Pfas on him I wouldn't want him taking care of my loved one but this is the type of people kane in Scott hires

  • Tisa Hammond
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My step father is in Kane Scott the rehab unit was good they moved him to skilled it all went down hill I was here 6 hours not even 1person checked on him. The next day he had to go to bathroom we waited over half hour even went to talk to a nurse she said 1min which turn into another 15 he had to go so my Mom who is 85 and I took him ourselves we got him back in bed then someone came and said change of shift sorry I saids not 45 minutes ago

  • Charlotte Vescovo
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Well I like working there that's like taking care of the residents there they're very pleasant and nice and the people that I work with are very nice and pleasant to I like it because it's very comfortable clean and understandable with people anyway that's what I like about

  • Tele Medicine
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Spartan surroundings, but the best and most thorough Rehab facility after hospitalizations in Allegheny County. Therapists are great. Nursing staff is very very good...and caring ?TY to everyone involved in my rehab.

  • Gary Reiche
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My Mom likes it here.

About John J Kane Regional Center-Sc

General Information

Legal Business NameCounty Of Allegheny
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 9, 1983 (36 years)
Capacity311
Residents258
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for John J Kane Regional Center-Sc

John J Kane Regional Center-Sc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 20, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of John J Kane Regional Center-Sc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.6%
99.6%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.2%
58.9%
54.2%
62.7%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
27.0%
21.1%
18.8%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.8%
22.2%
23.6%
18.7%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.6%
15.9%
14.1%
12.1%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.3%
22.9%
24.5%
22.0%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.3%
8.0%
8.1%
5.4%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
6.6%
6.7%
1.9%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.8%
0.4%
0.7%
0.4%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
1.6%
0.8%
0.9%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
2.0%
1.2%
0.8%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5%
5.2%
3.6%
3.3%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

81.5%
88.7%
86.8%
73.6%
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.8%
91.4%
91.4%
91.4%
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.0%
73.5%
75.7%
71.6%
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.8%
14.3%
19.8%
21.0%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
1.8%
1.5%
1.3%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.2%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places