Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Little Sisters Of The Poor

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Pittsburgh Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sharon Turner
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Little sisters is the most loving and caring place. It was the best decision ever. My mom is very happy and well cared for here. Its a well cared for well maintained home filled with love and respect for all residents there (unassisted or nursing). Due to the extremely long waiting list, it is hard to actually become a resident on either the unassisted or nursing side but once you become a resident you never have to worry about the level of care love respect. All of the sisters, staff, volunteers, residents make this beautiful place feel like home and treat even the family members like family.

  • Jan
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Nice place, wait along time to enter the building with security but residents seem happy and well taken care of.

  • Daniel Todorowski
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Beautiful apartments with friendly neighbors and staff. The facility serves both community lunch and dinner and provides for many monthly activities (Bingo, Mass, day visits to most Pittsburgh events, shows, Kennywood, Gateway Clipper and many more at no cost to the residents. The Little Sisters is a wonderful place to live.

  • Garry Patriquin
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The sisters along with rheir staff give fantastic care to their residents at 1028 Benton Ave., in Pittsburgh PA. I can attest to this because I am a very content resident in room SH104. - Fr. Garry

  • Judith Banks
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Great rummage sale.

About Little Sisters Of The Poor

General Information

Legal Business NameLittle Sisters Of The Poor Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 11, 2008 (11 years)
Capacity48
Residents47
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Little Sisters Of The Poor

Little Sisters Of The Poor was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 8, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that paid feeding assistants 1) completed training; 2) work under the supervision of a RN or LPN; and 3) feed only residents who have no complicated feeding problems.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Little Sisters Of The Poor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.9%
98.0%
98.0%
98.0%
95.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.9%
40.0%
50.0%
34.8%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.0%
12.8%
14.6%
19.1%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.2%
27.7%
25.0%
26.1%
20.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.6%
13.3%
15.2%
15.6%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
12.8%
25.0%
21.7%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.4%
12.8%
6.4%
6.4%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
28.6%
30.5%
11.3%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.2%
8.7%
8.7%
6.5%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.6%
6.4%
6.2%
2.1%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
2.2%
2.0%
1.4%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
83.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
82.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
64.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places