Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. Quarryville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Very impressed with this nursing home. From the admission staff to the nursing staff they are top notch, caring, professional, dedicated people. Thanks for all the care given to my stepfather, Jud Gears, during his last days. I am forever grateful.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The staff is top notch, the facility is very nice and clean. The outside of the building is just as beautiful. The restaurant is very good, and not they have an ice cream parlor. Great place to retire.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My youngest Daughter is an Certified CNA at this Facility.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    i worked there for 2 years. the nursing staff is great and so are the residents

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    The Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community is a very very nice place. My mother spent her last three years there being cared for by some of the most caring people I have ever met. Even my mother at 93 yrs said she should have moved there earlier as she found that the staff and people who live at the retirement community very pleasing and caring. I told the administrator that I felt very comfortable in the facility and could see that the staff cared about its residents a lot. I also told them that I never saw anyone who was in the full care portion of the facility by themselves as there was always someone with each of the residents making sure they were being cared for. In the final days of my mothers life she had someone with her 24-7 and the staff just did not sit there, they read to her and let her know she was not alone and that everything was ok. If and when my time comes that I need a full care facility I hope that I will be able to find a place as nice with a staff that is as good and caring.

About Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

General Information

Legal Business NameQuarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1975 (42 years)
Capacity130
Residents104
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 21, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

September 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.5%
75.0%
65.6%
75.7%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.2%
26.1%
21.0%
16.1%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
8.6%
7.4%
7.7%
2.9%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.4%
12.0%
10.8%
13.6%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
6.5%
8.5%
5.9%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.4%
9.0%
11.2%
6.9%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2%
4.3%
1.2%
3.3%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.1%
1.1%
3.7%
4.5%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1%
5.4%
3.5%
1.1%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1%
1.1%
3.5%
2.2%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
2.4%
3.7%
3.2%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
98.6%
98.6%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
91.5%
86.4%
86.6%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.0%
13.6%
13.4%
8.8%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
1.8%
0.0%
2.7%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places