Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Spruce Manor Nursing And Rehab

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. West Reading
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Well where do I begin with this place first off it's infested with mice seconal filthy dirty blood and other bodily stains all over the floor understaffed poorly managed would never send anyone in my family not even my dog on my enemy highly not recommend this place

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    There are patients there who are being treated poorly and someone needs to step up and do something about it

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

  • ★★★★★ 6 years ago

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Spruce Manor Nursing And Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameOak Hrc Spruce LLC
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 18, 1967 ()
Capacity184
Residents170
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Spruce Manor Nursing And Rehab

Spruce Manor Nursing And Rehab
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 13, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

August 30, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

April 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.

March 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide residents with private access to a telephone.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Spruce Manor Nursing And Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.4%
91.8%
91.8%
91.8%
95.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.0%
94.4%
96.2%
92.6%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.4%
32.1%
40.0%
32.7%
56.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.8%
23.7%
21.3%
22.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.6%
29.1%
37.9%
25.0%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.2%
18.0%
16.5%
15.5%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5%
12.8%
16.8%
15.9%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3%
2.5%
6.3%
2.8%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.6%
9.6%
4.4%
8.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2%
5.3%
5.9%
7.4%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.5%
3.9%
3.2%
3.8%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7%
3.2%
2.5%
5.6%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
3.8%
3.1%
3.7%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.6%
77.1%
75.6%
78.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.9%
76.5%
76.5%
76.5%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.7%
-
56.7%
54.9%
62.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.9%
8.6%
17.9%
19.0%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.5%
1.1%
1.4%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016PA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places