Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cherry Hill Manor

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Rhode Island (RI)
  4. Johnston
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I've been a visitor at The Hill for 12 years. I was P.O.A. for a resident/friend for 7 years, continued visiting another resident for a year, and then my Mom ended up there in 2013. She passed away in May of this year and I have since become a volunteer - visiting residents one-on-one. The current administrator is top-notch - very caring and hands-on. Therapy and Activities departments are beyond great. I've gotten to know staff in all departments and there are some really wonderful people - it's more like a family (staff, residents, visitors) - which is why I'm still drawn there. No facility is going to be perfect 100% of the time, but Cherry Hill Manor aka 'The Hill' is highly recommended.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Well I really like at that place it's so awesome it's taking care of elderly and make sure they have the best life on the world after the world ends like it did to mine like my grandfather Antonio

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    iDo not reccomend this nursing home for rehab if taking medication. In my opinion the staff does not take the proper steps to ensure that the proper monitoring is conducted to maintain the patients health. My mother was sick with Mercer and taking a strong a.antibiotic and her kidneys failed due to neglected blood labs. She wound up back in the hospital. And as far as physical therapy she barely did anything besides sitting up in a chair. We took her home and administered her IV Antibiotics and nursed her back to heatlh and gave her the physical activty that she needed.

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

About Cherry Hill Manor

General Information

Legal Business NameLife Care Centers Of America, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1977 (40 years)
Capacity170
Residents158
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cherry Hill Manor

Cherry Hill Manor
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Rhode Island Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 4, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cherry Hill Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.1%
96.4%
96.4%
96.4%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
93.9%
95.5%
95.4%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.6%
64.6%
66.0%
70.9%
43.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.5%
17.8%
19.2%
16.7%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.7%
19.8%
18.4%
16.6%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.3%
8.5%
10.0%
14.0%
17.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.2%
15.3%
22.8%
15.7%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.9%
11.5%
11.6%
9.5%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
3.1%
3.0%
3.8%
6.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
0.8%
4.0%
3.3%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.0%
3.9%
2.3%
3.8%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.9%
6.8%
5.3%
5.3%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
1.5%
1.6%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.2%
94.1%
96.7%
95.4%
81.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.3%
90.7%
90.7%
90.7%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.0%
69.0%
68.4%
75.6%
71.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.0%
21.6%
16.8%
16.5%
18.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
3.2%
3.6%
3.8%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016RI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places