Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Presbyterian Home Of Sc - Foothills

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Carolina (SC)
  4. Easley
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    After looking around, we found Foothills to be the "class act" of retirement homes in the area. My Mother went seamlessly from a beautiful independent living cottage, to a 2 bedroom independent living apartment, to skilled nursing care. My family appreciated the warm, friendly, comfortable and well maintained facility and surroundings. The staff and administration work hard, and are very successful at making it feel like home. As with any place that tries to address the wide-ranging needs of a diverse senior population, not everything goes perfect. But my family did find the staff and especially the administration to be genuinely caring and very responsive to any concerns.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My parents moved to Foothills Presbyterian Community in Easley in July of 2014. Dad had suffered a stroke the year before and Mom needed help caring for him. All of the staff have been compassionate and professional in the care they have provided for my parents. When Dad passed away this summer, from complications from the stroke, he spent several weeks in the hospital. The ICU nurse was amazed at the steady stream of visits he received from Foothills staff! He had never seen such support from a retirement community. In the year of my Dad's decline, everyone from the nurses and therapists, to housekeeping and dining staff, went the extra mile (many extra miles) to meet his and Mom's needs. As a pastor, I have visited more than a few retirement and nursing communities. I would give Foothills Presbyterian Community the highest accolades for the way they love and provide for the residents under their care.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother lived at Foothills for three years-up until this past August. She loved living there in her independent apartment;it was clean,comfortable and well cared for by the staff.In other words, it felt like her home. Unfortunatley her health declined. But even as she faced the idea of losing her apartment and some of her independence, I never was concerned with the level of care, committment and compassion that would come from the staff during that difficult transition in her(our) lives. The staff and environment are first class. I am not sure what the construction review refers to as we did not experience any of that. I would absolutely recommend families in need of senior care to seek out Presbyterian Community as an option for continuum of care. I would also be willing to share more information on our experience, if requested.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    worked on the newly constructed wing. horrible planning and construction. most contractors quit the job a few days in and were replaced by new contractors... who quit soon after. Between the mold issue (that appeared during new building process) and the thrown together process of construction, this is a total crap hole. DO NOT PUT YOUR ELDERLY LOVED ONES HERE!!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother lived in the Healthcare wing at the PH in Easley for 3 years - they are compassionate and trustful care givers. It's a beautiful facility and the staff and residents are wonderful. While no retirement community and nursing home may be perfect, this one did all they could to help my mother and our family through some very difficult times.

About Presbyterian Home Of Sc - Foothills

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 21, 2011 (6 years)
Capacity22
Residents19
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Presbyterian Home Of Sc - Foothills

Presbyterian Home Of Sc - Foothills
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 30, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Presbyterian Home Of Sc - Foothills require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 50min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
94.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
26.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

95.8%
92.8%
95.3%
96.2%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.9%
86.8%
86.8%
86.8%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
28.3%
30.4%
15.2%
19.6%
62.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.8%
10.4%
9.4%
16.3%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
0.0%
2.5%
2.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places