Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurel Baye Healthcare Of Greenville

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Carolina (SC)
  4. Greenville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Laurel Baye Healthcare Of Greenville

General Information

Legal Business NameGreenville Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 4, 1967 ()
Capacity132
Residents127
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurel Baye Healthcare Of Greenville

Laurel Baye Healthcare Of Greenville
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 25, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

July 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurel Baye Healthcare Of Greenville require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
97.2%
97.2%
97.2%
94.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9%
99.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.4%
68.2%
81.0%
65.0%
53.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.4%
29.4%
31.7%
29.8%
26.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.7%
21.9%
15.4%
23.5%
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.5%
9.0%
12.0%
11.8%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5%
16.5%
7.5%
14.6%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
10.8%
5.3%
6.3%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8%
16.3%
12.9%
6.3%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.3%
2.2%
1.2%
0.0%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
0.0%
2.3%
1.1%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
2.0%
4.3%
6.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3%
3.0%
5.3%
7.4%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1%
3.0%
4.3%
4.2%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

60.8%
72.0%
79.9%
75.7%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
67.8%
71.3%
71.3%
71.3%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.0%
75.3%
70.1%
76.8%
62.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.3%
18.2%
15.0%
15.3%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
1.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.9%
0.5%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened