Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Myrtle Beach Manor

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Carolina (SC)
  4. Myrtle Beach
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Myrtle Beach Manor

General Information

Legal Business NameFs Tenant Pool I Trust
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 9, 1970 (47 years)
Capacity60
Residents51
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Myrtle Beach Manor

Myrtle Beach Manor
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

75.0%
72.7%
72.7%
72.7%
94.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
90.0%
-
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
26.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
10.0%
-
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
10.0%
-
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
0.0%
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.0%
93.0%
93.1%
93.6%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.0%
88.3%
88.3%
88.3%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.9%
84.3%
82.6%
69.8%
62.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.1%
4.2%
5.4%
17.1%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
2.0%
0.5%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened