Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

J F Hawkins Nursing Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Carolina (SC)
  4. Newberry
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About J F Hawkins Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameNewberry Operator LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity118
Residents110
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for J F Hawkins Nursing Home

J F Hawkins Nursing Home
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide proof that residents' personal money that is deposited with the nursing home is secure.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

February 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of J F Hawkins Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.1%
97.2%
97.2%
97.2%
94.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1%
93.1%
89.4%
91.1%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.4%
53.8%
67.7%
77.4%
53.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.0%
38.6%
33.7%
33.7%
26.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.4%
18.4%
20.6%
34.9%
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.7%
15.7%
16.1%
17.8%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.9%
23.0%
22.4%
24.7%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.3%
4.0%
1.9%
3.7%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.8%
12.0%
10.6%
8.1%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
4.9%
7.8%
8.2%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
2.0%
1.0%
3.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9%
4.0%
1.9%
2.0%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
2.4%
0.8%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

68.4%
69.4%
64.7%
54.0%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.0%
73.6%
73.6%
73.6%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3%
75.1%
79.0%
86.0%
62.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.9%
17.7%
12.3%
16.0%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9%
3.6%
4.9%
2.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened