Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Pruitthealth- Rock Hill

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Carolina (SC)
  4. Rock Hill
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Pruitthealth- Rock Hill

General Information

Legal Business NamePruitthealth - Rock Hill, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1980 (37 years)
Capacity132
Residents109
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Pruitthealth- Rock Hill

Pruitthealth- Rock Hill
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 28, 2016 - 9 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

September 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

June 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

August 14, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionQuickly tell the resident's doctor the results of laboratory tests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's file.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by the attending physician.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Pruitthealth- Rock Hill require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.8%
93.8%
93.8%
93.8%
94.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.8%
89.1%
88.1%
88.8%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.9%
65.6%
51.7%
52.8%
53.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.7%
20.0%
16.2%
15.9%
26.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.7%
28.4%
20.3%
29.7%
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.7%
3.3%
4.8%
5.7%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8%
25.3%
6.9%
17.1%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.4%
14.4%
15.6%
10.8%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
4.4%
6.0%
2.3%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6%
12.5%
7.2%
5.3%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.2%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
13.2%
10.8%
11.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.2%
1.2%
2.2%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
4.3%
3.9%
2.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

52.6%
64.0%
69.4%
73.9%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.3%
62.0%
62.0%
62.0%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.1%
56.0%
53.4%
53.5%
62.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.2%
25.5%
28.9%
33.3%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.7%
1.2%
1.2%
1.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
1.3%
1.5%
0.9%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened