Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. South Carolina
  3. West Columbia Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Chandra Swearinger
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    It's a excellent place to work and or live the staff is great and they all really make you feel like family I absolutely love it here.

  • paul truesdale
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This is a wonderful community. the staff is friendly and courteous and it is such a pleasure to see how the residents of this community are so active. The wellness center is simply magnificent and has won a National Award for Innovation. The dining here is also spectacular and has several choices for venues. You can dine in the Palmetto room with more of a fine atmosphere or enjoy meals at the Bistro for a relaxed in/outdoor dining experience. They also have a coffee shop on site which is a great place to gather and chat. I would highly recommend looking into this community.

  • Jack Porter
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Hilary Royer is a rude and uncaring person. She will lie to your face, Do not trust her for one second. I don't know where she bought her education or learn how not to be a professional, but its probably from the same place she bought her outfits.

  • Joyce Brazell
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father in law was there for several weeks for rehab. The nurses, physical therapists, doctors, cafeteria staff, cleaning staff and anyone we came in contact with at Still Hopes were ALL outstanding!! They took very good care of our Papa!! They were also very good to all our family members!! Thank you Still Hopes!! You are the BEST!!

  • Julie Tampa
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This is a beautiful community with lots of wonderful residents with incredible stories. The employees are lovely, often going above and beyond to meet the needs and desires of residents. My parents are residents in Independent Living and are able to pursue their interests knowing that housekeeping, yard work, maintenance, and at least one meal per day are taken care of. They were fine living at home, but being at Still Hopes takes away the stress of home ownership for them, and for the rest of the family!

About Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community

General Information

Legal Business NameSouth Carolina Episcopal Home At Still Hopes
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 8, 2011 (9 years)
Capacity22
Residents21
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community

Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 5, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 30min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
3hr 10min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
7hr 40min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
93.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
25.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
14.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
8.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
1.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.0%
71.7%
67.2%
69.7%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.0%
84.3%
84.3%
84.3%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.1%
64.5%
67.2%
69.0%
68.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.2%
9.4%
7.3%
7.6%
12.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
2.0%
2.0%
3.1%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017SC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places