Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Avera Rosebud Country Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. South Dakota (SD)
  4. Gregory
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:
Other Nearby Nursing Homes
Winner Regional Healthcare Center
Winner, SD
23 miles

About Avera Rosebud Country Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameAvera Mckennan
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1975 (42 years)
Capacity42
Residents39
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Avera Rosebud Country Care Center

Avera Rosebud Country Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of South Dakota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 26, 2016 - 10 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep clinical record information safe.

July 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

May 21, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Avera Rosebud Country Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.0%
97.5%
97.5%
97.5%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.4%
100.0%
100.0%
94.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.4%
23.1%
18.4%
16.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.6%
24.3%
13.8%
13.6%
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.2%
21.1%
18.9%
11.1%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.4%
16.2%
2.8%
11.8%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
10.0%
8.1%
12.6%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.6%
5.7%
2.7%
0.0%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
10.3%
6.7%
3.4%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.8%
2.8%
5.4%
0.0%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
28.6%
5.7%
5.4%
0.0%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3%
5.1%
7.9%
8.1%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
3.0%
4.4%
4.6%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
75.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016SD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened