Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Bradley Health Care & Rehab

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Tennessee (TN)
  4. Cleveland
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Bradley Health Care & Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameBradley County Nursing Home
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 22, 1981 (36 years)
Capacity213
Residents186
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Bradley Health Care & Rehab

Bradley Health Care & Rehab
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Tennessee Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 1, 2016 - 6 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

September 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,100 fine

June 24, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Bradley Health Care & Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
95.9%
95.9%
95.9%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.8%
75.2%
85.6%
90.4%
91.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.1%
56.2%
39.5%
37.8%
55.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.3%
43.4%
42.0%
39.5%
36.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.4%
12.4%
25.4%
25.4%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.2%
28.9%
25.3%
24.4%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7%
8.5%
10.5%
11.3%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.2%
6.5%
6.7%
6.9%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.0%
7.8%
8.5%
11.6%
8.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
4.3%
1.7%
3.9%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8%
6.5%
2.4%
4.9%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
0.6%
1.2%
1.2%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8%
3.2%
3.1%
4.2%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.9%
14.3%
10.2%
12.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.6%
83.7%
84.1%
81.5%
81.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.3%
81.8%
81.8%
81.8%
80.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.0%
67.8%
59.0%
62.9%
61.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.1%
20.2%
26.4%
16.0%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
3.1%
1.6%
3.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.7%
1.7%
0.7%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened