Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Standing Stone Care And Rehab

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Tennessee (TN)
  4. Monterey
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Please DO NOT take your love one to this facility. My mother was there 3 months and during this time there were to many instances that she was neglected along with the little lady she shared a room with. Many times while I was visiting her she would need to go to the restroom, we push the call button and wait and wait. 30 minutes later I would have to go out into the hall to find a CNA to assist her and there would be 2 or 3 standing talking and laughing while my mothers call light was on and beeping. I called and ask that someone assist her eating and was assured they would do so, a LIE she aspirated 2 times in a week from eating lying almost flat by her self, the last time was put on life support and almost died. When talked to the administrators about these complaints which was only the tip of the iceberg of all the problems we had with moms care, they tried to make excuses and sweep everything under the rug and even went as far as saying we didn't make them aware of the problems. ANOTHER LIE as we complained many times to different people but never changed anything even after being told it would be taken care of. I would not take my dog to this place for care, we pulled my mother out immediately and now she is receiving the care she should have been getting all along. They need to fire a bunch and hire people that are passionate about working and taking care of the elderly because the majority of the ones at Standing Stone could care less about the residents and only about doing as little as they can to draw a pay check! WISH I DIDNT HAVE TO GIVE THEM THE 1 STAR but won't let you post 0 stars. We contacted different people at the Standing Stone Facility and none of our concerns were addressed, so why would we believe contacting the corporate administrator would have change anything. We are not blaming Signature Health as the owner we are blaming the administration and staff at the facility itself and not everyone there just several that we talked to that told us the issues would be taken care of but were not. It really doesn't matter now, we have moved my mother and feel like she is receiving excellent care now. Again No Blame is being placed on ownership, only some of the staff at the nursing home. And I stand by my comments, everything thing i said was the truth and we have pictures and witnesses to back up everything I said. Even one administrator told me our complaints were legitimate.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

About Standing Stone Care And Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameLp Monterey LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 4, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity115
Residents90
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Standing Stone Care And Rehab

Standing Stone Care And Rehab
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Tennessee Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 26, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

October 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

September 29, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$85,768 fine
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Standing Stone Care And Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.6%
98.7%
98.7%
98.7%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.8%
96.0%
98.6%
95.8%
91.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.8%
30.7%
31.9%
28.2%
36.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.3%
21.2%
21.1%
21.0%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.3%
16.7%
16.9%
11.8%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
17.6%
22.2%
20.0%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.2%
17.9%
20.7%
16.2%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.8%
6.9%
10.8%
14.1%
8.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
6.6%
3.0%
3.1%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3%
1.3%
2.7%
2.8%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3%
1.3%
0.0%
1.4%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.4%
89.3%
91.5%
95.2%
81.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.9%
88.0%
88.0%
88.0%
80.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.1%
57.6%
56.1%
59.0%
61.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
46.9%
24.2%
26.9%
15.4%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places