Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Community Care Of Rutherford

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Tennessee
  3. Murfreesboro Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Mitchell Stem
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    This place is amazing! My father in law and grandmother were at CCRC! The staff truly care. Sure they can be short staffed sometimes but they never once failed to give us and the residents less care. Everyone there became our 2nd family. All the staff members try their hardest to help the family take care of loved ones. I would highly recommend this place. Only suggestion I have is that the county needs to give CCRC money for a face lift for the hallways(pink and blues are wayyyy out of style now)

  • O W
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Absolutely horrible! My grandmother is there and it pains me every time I visit, They neglect the care of the residents. They do not do 2 hour turns. The Nurse is rude and the staff doesn't check on residents nearly enough. They are understaffed without a question. It's so sad. These nursing homes have to be better regulated.

  • Mary Bayman
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I started here 6 months ago and love the progress that has been made on an already great place!! Staff truly care to know the residents and embrace everyone as family. Cannot wait for the things to come

  • Tabitha Brasher
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I have been a CCRC employee since 2011. Over the years times have changed, as have employees, but one thing remains the same: the love and care given to our residents will always be the number one priority. We truly are a family on the farm.

  • Judy Fairbanks
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom spent a week in the hospital before passing. When I went to check on her after she was not answering the phone, I found her basically lifeless. No one had notified me that she was ill. She died of severe pneumonia and in my thoughts neglect. The nursing home has yet to call us. CCRC has gone way down after Mr. King, the previous administrator left. So sad.....

About Community Care Of Rutherford

General Information

Legal Business NameCommunity Care Of Rutherford County, Inc.
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1997 (22 years)
Capacity131
Residents124
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Community Care Of Rutherford

Community Care Of Rutherford was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Tennessee Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 12, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

July 29, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 14 days
---Fine$548,500 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Community Care Of Rutherford require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.5%
97.3%
97.3%
97.3%
93.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.3%
78.1%
80.0%
67.6%
56.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.3%
22.0%
18.1%
19.3%
36.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.2%
29.8%
31.4%
24.5%
21.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.0%
17.5%
18.0%
20.4%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.7%
28.0%
32.6%
32.7%
15.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7%
2.9%
4.7%
6.1%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4%
9.6%
11.2%
9.1%
5.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
10.4%
1.5%
0.0%
3.1%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
2.0%
1.0%
2.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
2.0%
0.0%
2.6%
4.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8%
3.8%
2.8%
0.9%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
2.4%
0.5%
1.8%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
1.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.7%
98.0%
98.4%
97.9%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.7%
92.2%
92.2%
92.2%
81.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
79.2%
-
65.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
12.0%
7.7%
15.4%
9.4%
11.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places