Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurel Manor Health Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Tennessee (TN)
  4. New Tazewell
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Laurel Manor Health Care

General Information

Legal Business NameDiversicare Leasing Corp.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 10, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity134
Residents108
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurel Manor Health Care

Laurel Manor Health Care
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Tennessee Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

June 24, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionQuickly tell the resident's doctor the results of laboratory tests.

April 27, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurel Manor Health Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 50min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1%
100.0%
100.0%
99.0%
91.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.9%
62.5%
44.4%
80.4%
55.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.8%
56.9%
52.6%
52.5%
36.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.4%
12.8%
28.0%
14.1%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
8.2%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
1.0%
3.1%
5.9%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9%
4.9%
3.2%
2.0%
8.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
3.9%
2.1%
4.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
1.1%
2.1%
0.9%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.0%
1.0%
4.1%
4.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.9%
95.3%
98.1%
94.8%
81.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.4%
95.3%
95.3%
95.3%
80.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
69.4%
54.4%
61.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened