Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Pigeon Forge Care & Rehab Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Tennessee (TN)
  4. Pigeon Forge
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Pigeon Forge Care & Rehab Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLp Pigeon Forge LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity120
Residents79
Percent Occupied66%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Pigeon Forge Care & Rehab Center

Pigeon Forge Care & Rehab Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Tennessee Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 31, 2016 - 10 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

September 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

May 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHelp and prepare each resident for a safe and easy discharge or transfer from the nursing home.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Pigeon Forge Care & Rehab Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.4%
82.8%
82.8%
82.8%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.2%
74.6%
73.8%
88.3%
91.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.6%
90.5%
74.1%
73.9%
55.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50.8%
49.1%
53.3%
40.4%
36.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
37.3%
31.4%
27.5%
30.7%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
9.8%
10.9%
14.8%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3%
28.3%
8.8%
17.5%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.6%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.8%
12.1%
9.8%
1.7%
8.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
6.9%
4.9%
20.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3%
5.1%
4.9%
5.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
3.6%
1.6%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

87.9%
84.0%
85.5%
86.1%
81.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.4%
85.3%
85.4%
85.4%
80.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.7%
65.3%
67.6%
71.8%
61.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.8%
6.2%
5.4%
9.6%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
1.8%
1.0%
2.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened