Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Belmont At Twin Creeks

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Allen
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Wynter Jones
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Worst place i have ever had contact with. You care nothing for human beings. You should just close your doors you are not medical professionals you are people looking for a paychek. Prisoners are treated better with what limited medical staff is given. You almost killed my grandmother. Grim reapers at best.

  • Nicole Taylor
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My father has been at the Belmont for the past 4 weeks. I cannot begin to explain how awesome they have treated and took care of him. The nurses are always so attentive to his needs. He is not treated as just another patient but as someone they genuinely care about. The staff is always so helpful and kind. My father constantly talks about how well he is being cared for. Easily a 5 star review from me and my family!!

  • misty womack
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My grandmother was a patient. She's had to goto the hospital twice in a week. They almost killed her.

  • K.L. Evans
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Horrible, Horrible, Horrible - Giving them a 1 star is being generous... My father was there for rehab after a hip replacement during the month of Dec. 2016. I am sure there are quality nurses there but not in the wing my father resided in. All I can comment on are the morning and afternoon LPN's. They were inattentive, uncompassionate, understaffed, unpleasant and rude. The LPN's would ignore you at the front desk..it took me one time for that to happen - after that, I walked up and interrupted whatever they were doing just to have my father attend too. My father had to go to the bathroom and not only did he have a catheter- he was in a walker. He needed assistance and this one particular LPN...Honestly, I never saw someone move so quickly to get out of the room not to assist him. I had to assist my father with maneuvering his catheter through his pant leg just so he could use the restroom. This same LPN was told about feces on the carpet that needed to be cleaned - 2 days later nothing and I had to report to the Director of Nursing for it to be rectified. The only thing I can say positive was the Director of Nursing who tried his best to accommodate but he is also the one that allows this poor treatment to continue instead of firing the LPN's that are worthless...I IMPLORE you to not send your loved one to this facility and to make matters worse... not only did I check reviews (which checked out better than the other place we could have taken him) I was told by the Social Worker at Medical City Dallas that this place was good...

  • Nathon Lynchard
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Caring and friendly staff.

About The Belmont At Twin Creeks

General Information

Legal Business NameDecatur Hospital Authority
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 10, 2009 (8 years)
Capacity112
Residents69
Percent Occupied62%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Belmont At Twin Creeks

The Belmont At Twin Creeks was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 6, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

October 1, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Belmont At Twin Creeks require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA

45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 35min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 5min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
93.0%
93.0%
93.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
20.8%
-
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.4%
36.4%
32.4%
26.8%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.7%
37.8%
35.3%
33.1%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.2%
19.2%
19.6%
18.4%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.0%
35.7%
22.9%
26.3%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
1.9%
0.0%
4.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
12.5%
17.2%
12.5%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
1.9%
2.1%
6.1%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
5.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
99.6%
99.6%
100.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.8%
96.2%
96.2%
96.2%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.7%
53.8%
53.8%
59.0%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
6.9%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
0.5%
2.0%
1.7%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places