Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Matlock Place Health And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Arlington
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I wish I could put no star! These people are the worst.. My family member was dirty and smell horrible smell of pee and feces all the time they stayed in this place. Mostly all the staff don't care about the people they are taking care of.. Even the doctors don't care and don't have a clue about the patients they are seeing at this place. My family member could have die a number of times in this place if we didn't check on them regularly. The Food is horrible! Nutrition means nothing to this place. They feed everyone junk and horrible nasty food that doesn't taste like real food on top of that. They're so cheap you can tell by the way the food taste it's cheap food taste like fake food! If you care anything about your loved one do not bring them to this please.. The people are mean.. Mostly all of them are very rude!!! They hate to do there job!

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I wish i could give this NO stars. Do NOT put your loved one in the care of this facility or these people. After our 86 yr old mother was in Arlington Memorial Hospital for a few days, we were given several choices by their social worker at AMH for her rehab. We trusted that they would not give us bad info. That was the 1st mistake we made. She was there for rehab...not long term care. She was admitted to Matlock Place early on Friday and never received one minute of rehab. Our family had to physically go there to help with bathroom needs because she called and called and no one came. She begged us to come get her. It was heartbreaking. After many, many issues including not getting meds that were ordered, we found her another rehab facility so we went to get her. We found her bound to a chair, slumped completely over and barely responsive. We asked the nurse if she had been that way for a while and they said yes like it was no big deal. We then told the nurse, you call 911 or we will. They were reluctant but did it. We packed her things and went to Mansfield Methodist hospital...what a great facility that is. She never recovered and sadly passed away after being in hospice for less than a day. I have had 4 conversations with the staff at Matlock Place including their Social Worker and Head Administrator and two with their corporate office...Cascade Health Services. NOT ONE PERSON has followed up with those calls. Next call and letters of documentation is to DADS (Texas Department of Aging and Disabled Services) and then to whoever else will listen. They need to be shut down..NOW.

  • ★★★★★ 5 years ago

    I have a friend that is trying to recover from a stroke. We all know how important nutrition is to keeping your strength up so you can recover. This place gives their patient horrible food. It's junk food. They get corny Dogs for lunch or dinner about 3 times a week. Peanut Butter sandwich for dinner. If they do happen to get a cooked meal , it's full of greasy. I'd think twice before spending any time at this Hospital.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

About Matlock Place Health And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameCascade-Tarrant Health Services, Ltd
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 20, 2007 (10 years)
Capacity120
Residents83
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Matlock Place Health And Rehabilitation Center

Matlock Place Health And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 27, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Matlock Place Health And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

76.8%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.4%
90.6%
95.0%
95.9%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
32.1%
55.2%
37.5%
53.3%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.8%
16.1%
12.3%
13.4%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.7%
6.5%
13.9%
9.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.5%
6.3%
5.1%
5.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.2%
25.5%
26.0%
22.8%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.0%
12.2%
2.0%
4.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.3%
9.6%
6.4%
10.7%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
13.0%
5.4%
3.3%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.2%
7.8%
5.2%
1.4%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%
4.7%
5.0%
5.5%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.2%
10.0%
6.1%
5.9%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

58.5%
65.9%
76.7%
74.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.8%
63.2%
63.2%
62.8%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.4%
70.9%
75.1%
76.3%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.0%
7.1%
5.6%
3.8%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7%
2.7%
0.0%
0.9%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
1.1%
0.6%
1.1%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places