Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Monte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Texas
  3. Austin Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • K Stark
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Corporate Owned, Family Operated. It's not the prettiest nursing and rehab center, but it's what's on the inside that counts to be perfectly cliche about it. What's on the inside is a dedicated team of healthcare professionals who actually care. It's a great place to live and work.

  • Benjamin Buzan
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    They left an old man at HEB for 6 hours even after being notified they still sounded disinterested and no one came for him

  • wigmakerc wigmakerc
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    my mother was recently housed at monte siesta nursing and rehab she was taken to the hospital where I learned my mother has not been turned, has bedsores, her hair was in dredlocks, and no one notified me she was in such a condition. please be aware at the time i am posting this, I cannot find any reviews on this nursing home whatsoever. please note. they mistreated her. 0 stars

  • El Rios
    ★★★★★ a month ago

  • Brandy Hodgers
    ★★★★★ a year ago

About Monte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

General Information

Legal Business NameMonte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 8, 1996 (23 years)
Capacity97
Residents99
Percent OccupiedUnknown
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Monte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

Monte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 18, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

May 6, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive or get x-rays and other tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.

March 29, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

January 17, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

December 14, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

October 31, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

September 13, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

February 10, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 49 days

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Monte Siesta Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.7%
77.8%
77.8%
77.8%
93.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.0%
58.2%
57.1%
57.8%
92.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
26.1%
30.0%
32.7%
21.3%
49.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.8%
21.8%
24.4%
23.8%
25.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.4%
34.2%
26.8%
14.1%
20.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.4%
23.9%
18.2%
19.4%
16.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.6%
18.1%
8.5%
8.0%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.3%
9.0%
6.6%
7.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
2.0%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
23.2%
23.0%
12.8%
14.5%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5%
4.8%
0.0%
2.4%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
2.2%
1.1%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
9.9%
7.7%
8.9%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
1.1%
1.6%
1.8%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

40.4%
51.0%
60.8%
59.2%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.7%
70.6%
70.6%
70.6%
75.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
60.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
11.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6%
8.0%
8.3%
3.6%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
4.5%
3.1%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places