St James House Of Baytown
Photos
Reviews
Overall Rating 4.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★
-
Stefanie Mann★★★★★ a year agoI am so pleased that I chose St. James Place for my loved one. They took care of him so well. I recommend them!
-
Riley Little★★★★★ 8 months agomy grandpa was a navy veteran and 70 something years old and had Parkinson's dementia and was a major fall risk he fell at home and broke his hip he had surgery on it and we sent him here to recover and they let him fall 4 different times and the nurses station and he broke his other hip we sent him to the health care facility on I think garth for a little bit then brought him home for hospice and I had to spend my summer helping my grandmother take care of him Im disappointed terribly by the staff that were given charged over him and at these "good reviews"
-
phil henson★★★★★ 11 months agoWonderful friendly helpful place for my wife.
-
Olivia Bossier★★★★★ a year agoWorked there for two years and loved it such loving and caring co workers on down to the residents!!!!
-
Elvira Barajas★★★★★ a year agoTotally the most love & care that my family member could have here.Were a big family here .
About St James House Of Baytown
General Information
| Legal Business Name | Baytown Transitional Care Center LLC |
| Ownership Type | For Profit - Corporation |
| Changed Ownership In The Last 12 Months | No |
| First Accepted Medicare | January 13, 2004 (16 years) |
| Capacity | 105 |
| Residents | 100 |
| Percent Occupied | 95% |
| Program Participation | Medicare And Medicaid |
| Resident And Family Councils | Both |
| In Hospital | No |
| Continuing Care Retirement Community | No |
| Special Focus Facility | No |
| Auto Sprinkler System In Required Areas | Yes |
Ratings for St James House Of Baytown
St James House Of Baytown was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
About Medicare Ratings | Overall Rating |
| Health Inspections Rating |
 | Quality Measures Rating |
 | Staff Rating |
| RN Staff Rating |
Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes
Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years 
Compare The Number of Problems
Types of Problems at Nursing Homes
Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.
| Residents Affected | |||
| Severity of the Deficiency | Few | Some | Many |
| Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety | J | K | L |
| Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy | G | H | I |
| No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy | D | E | F |
| No actual harm with potential for minimal harm | A | B | C |
May 12, 2017 - 3 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public. |
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Maintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards. |
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay. |
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged. |
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Develop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. |
| E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Keep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%. |
| E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being. |
| E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments. |
February 28, 2017 - 3 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Complaint | 1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents. |
June 10, 2016 - 4 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | Payment Denial | Payment denial for 9 days |
February 4, 2016 - 4 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | Fine | $55,100 fine |
August 21, 2015 - 4 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | Fine | $25,753 fine |
May 27, 2015 - 5 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | Fine | $34,150 fine |
Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day
Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St James House Of Baytown require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.
| 3hr 15min | 2hr 30min |
| Reported | Expected |
| CNA | |
| 50min | 40min |
| Reported | Expected |
| LPN | |
| 30min | 1hr 10min |
| Reported | Expected |
| RN | |
| 4hr 35min | 4hr 20min |
| Reported | Expected |
| Total Nursing | |
This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.
Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents
| 85.2% | 96.0% | 96.0% | 96.0% | 93.1% | 94.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 81.1% | 85.3% | 83.2% | 77.4% | 92.0% | 94.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 50.0% | 51.4% | 48.7% | 53.8% | 49.5% | 47.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 11.1% | 13.6% | 18.3% | 15.4% | 25.9% | 22.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 17.5% | 25.0% | 25.6% | 15.1% | 20.7% | 18.2% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 4.5% | 9.5% | 10.6% | 6.6% | 16.8% | 15.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 11.7% | 21.3% | 22.1% | 18.7% | 18.7% | 15.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 8.1% | 7.4% | 10.6% | 8.9% | 5.8% | 7.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 6.9% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 2.4% | 15.3% | 18.8% | 8.9% | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 1.2% | 6.4% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 2.2% | 3.2% | 4.2% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents
| 67.9% | 75.0% | 62.2% | 55.3% | 78.7% | 83.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 50.9% | 73.8% | 73.8% | 73.8% | 75.4% | 81.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| - | - | - | - | 60.0% | 67.5% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 25.6% | 18.9% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 11.5% | 13.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
| 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
