St James House Of Baytown
Contact Information
5800 W BAKER RDBaytown, TX 77520
Price & Availability: (877) 311-2675
General Info: (281) 425-1200
County: Harris
Photos
Reviews
Overall Rating 4.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★
-
Stefanie Mann★★★★★ 2 months ago
I am so pleased that I chose St. James Place for my loved one. They took care of him so well. I recommend them!
-
phil henson★★★★★ a week ago
Wonderful friendly helpful place for my wife.
-
Olivia Bossier★★★★★ 5 months ago
Worked there for two years and loved it such loving and caring co workers on down to the residents!!!!
-
Elvira Barajas★★★★★ 6 months ago
Totally the most love & care that my family member could have here.Were a big family here .
-
Linda Gouner★★★★★ 6 months ago
Loving,kind and gentle care
About St James House Of Baytown
General Information
Legal Business Name | Baytown Transitional Care Center LLC |
Ownership Type | For Profit - Corporation |
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 Months | No |
First Accepted Medicare | January 13, 2004 (15 years) |
Capacity | 105 |
Residents | 100 |
Percent Occupied | 95% |
Program Participation | Medicare And Medicaid |
Resident And Family Councils | Both |
In Hospital | No |
Continuing Care Retirement Community | No |
Special Focus Facility | No |
Auto Sprinkler System In Required Areas | Yes |
Ratings for St James House Of Baytown
St James House Of Baytown was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
About Medicare Ratings![]() | Overall Rating |
![]() | Health Inspections Rating |
![]() | Quality Measures Rating |
![]() | Staff Rating |
![]() | RN Staff Rating |
Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes
Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years 
Compare The Number of Problems
Types of Problems at Nursing Homes
Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.
Residents Affected | |||
Severity of the Deficiency | Few | Some | Many |
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety | J | K | L |
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy | G | H | I |
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy | D | E | F |
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm | A | B | C |
May 12, 2017 - 2 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public. |
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Maintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards. |
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay. |
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged. |
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Develop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. |
E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Keep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%. |
E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being. |
E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments. |
February 28, 2017 - 2 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
D | Few | Potential for Harm | Complaint | 1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents. |
June 10, 2016 - 3 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | - | Payment Denial | Payment denial for 9 days |
F | Many | Potential for Harm | Complaint+Inspection | Develop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. |
E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life. |
E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being. |
March 1, 2016 - 3 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
G | Few | Actual Harm | Complaint | Provide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident . |
G | Few | Actual Harm | Complaint | Protect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property. |
February 4, 2016 - 3 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | - | Fine | $55,100 fine |
August 21, 2015 - 4 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | - | Fine | $25,753 fine |
May 27, 2015 - 4 years ago
Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | - | Fine | $34,150 fine |
Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day 
Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St James House Of Baytown require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.
3hr 15min | 2hr 30min |
Reported | Expected |
CNA |
50min | 40min |
Reported | Expected |
LPN |
30min | 1hr 10min |
Reported | Expected |
RN |
4hr 35min | 4hr 20min |
Reported | Expected |
Total Nursing |
This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.
Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents 
85.2% | 96.0% | 96.0% | 96.0% | 93.1% | 94.9% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
81.1% | 85.3% | 83.2% | 77.4% | 92.0% | 94.1% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
50.0% | 51.4% | 48.7% | 53.8% | 49.5% | 47.7% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
11.1% | 13.6% | 18.3% | 15.4% | 25.9% | 22.7% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
17.5% | 25.0% | 25.6% | 15.1% | 20.7% | 18.2% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
4.5% | 9.5% | 10.6% | 6.6% | 16.8% | 15.7% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
11.7% | 21.3% | 22.1% | 18.7% | 18.7% | 15.0% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
8.1% | 7.4% | 10.6% | 8.9% | 5.8% | 7.1% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
6.9% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
2.4% | 15.3% | 18.8% | 8.9% | 4.8% | 5.6% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
1.2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
1.2% | 6.4% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 3.4% | 3.7% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
2.2% | 3.2% | 4.2% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents 
67.9% | 75.0% | 62.2% | 55.3% | 78.7% | 83.1% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
50.9% | 73.8% | 73.8% | 73.8% | 75.4% | 81.0% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
- | - | - | - | 60.0% | 67.5% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
25.6% | 18.9% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 11.5% | 13.7% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
0.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
1.2% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | TX | U.S. |
