Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Beeville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Robert Evans
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Great team. Wonderful memory care neighborhood. 5 star facility.

  • Gloria Naderhoff
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My experience is so sad and heart breaking that I'm going to spare you all the heartache. I know that me ,my spouse and my 2 sons will wear this scar for life. If you should ever need to put your love one in a nursing home make sure it's not this one. Check the score rating. Now I know why their score is so bad. I believe in karma. If you do good, good comes back. If you do bad , bad comes back at you.

  • Cole Browning
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    This is the worst place you can put a loved one, the director, lied to us about everything they were capable of doing . They lost my sister's dentures and after 2 mo. Still no teeth.and my sister is a choke risk. In 3 mo. They allowed her to gain 40 + lbs. And refused to follow Dr.s diet orders. My sister has a heart condition and this can kill her. They did not care. Then when we decided to take her out , the director tryed to threaten us by saying we abused my sister. I'm the gaurdian of a Downs , 55 yr old woman, my sister. We put her there to be takin Care of . But this place found it easier to let her eat herself to be so fat she was having trouble walking. In 3 mo. And the lies , disrespect and total rude behavior of the director and staff was incredible. This place is about money, not care. Keep them happy till they die. Regardless of they fact it is being brought on premature due to there care. I plan on taking legal action on the director and the facility. I'm sure hoping when the people in charge of this facility read this post , they take proper action . Otherwise they will be battling a state funded attorney, that represents my sister's legal matters. Court appointed....By the way. This was my experience, and does not mean all people receive that experience, and this facility my not conduct themselves in this manner. As a rule.But it happen to me.

About Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NamePinnacle Health Facilities Xv Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 12, 1991 (27 years)
Capacity120
Residents62
Percent Occupied52%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 29, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
52.4%
59.3%
66.7%
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.9%
20.8%
10.4%
14.3%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.2%
16.7%
24.7%
18.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.2%
6.9%
11.1%
16.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
9.4%
8.3%
9.5%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.6%
4.1%
3.9%
4.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.7%
13.6%
14.5%
6.1%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
9.8%
8.7%
8.3%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.7%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
1.7%
1.8%
8.2%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
1.7%
3.6%
2.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.7%
100.0%
100.0%
97.4%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.7%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.1%
23.3%
27.3%
18.5%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places