Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Park Place Manor Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Belton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    My mother has been at Park Place Manor for eight months now and she loves it! Mom raves about the food and never seems to tire of it. It is an older and smaller facility; but don't let that deceive you. I have been very impressed with the cleanliness of the home and the care that she has received. Park Place Manor is a hometown, family oriented cozy facility. Mom gets a lot of love, friendly conversation, and personal touches from the staff and volunteers on a daily basis. Because it so highly recommended and a small facility...it can be difficult to get into; and you won't find the frills associated with a larger home; but the love and care more than makes up for it. You won't find a better group of people to take care of your family than right here.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My mother in law has been at Park Place for going on 2 years now. I am super impressed with the care that she receives, the cleanliness of the facility, and my mother in law really enjoys the meals. The staff is very attentive to all of her needs and they genuinely care about her. I would not have her or any loved one anywhere else but at Park Place Manor.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    This is a good example of a great facility in the process of decline. The only thing that is higher than the staff turnover is the administrators opinion of herself. Recently decisions regarding patient care have been made from a business standpoint and not by Nursing. This has been reflected in the recent State reviews. It is still one of the better facilities but you have to stay aware of the care being provided to your loved ones.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    For potential employees if u want to be slandered everyday and lied on this is your place to be! They dnt even do direct deposit so u have to drive up there on your day off n if the business office close early dnt expect them to tell u!! This was a horrible experience and I wouldn't recommend working here for anybody who takes pride in their work the nurses are so snobby and talk about each other and cnas like dogs!!!! They lucky they didn't get sued for slander!!!!!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Excellent facility. Great staff. Clean!!!!

About Park Place Manor Inc

General Information

Legal Business NamePark Place Manor, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 14, 2003 (15 years)
Capacity114
Residents95
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Park Place Manor Inc

Park Place Manor Inc
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 22, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

October 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionCompletely assess the resident at least every twelve months.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.

July 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,300 fine

December 11, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Park Place Manor Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
97.7%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.3%
82.0%
83.3%
71.4%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.3%
21.3%
21.2%
24.1%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.0%
16.6%
16.0%
10.0%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.2%
13.8%
10.5%
9.5%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.1%
12.2%
9.5%
14.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5%
6.7%
4.8%
7.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4%
6.9%
5.2%
5.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
8.8%
1.4%
5.5%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.5%
11.2%
10.8%
8.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.6%
18.4%
17.7%
14.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
4.6%
5.2%
9.4%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
3.3%
3.2%
4.4%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
98.4%
100.0%
100.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
95.2%
95.2%
95.2%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.0%
58.6%
66.2%
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.0%
16.3%
5.6%
3.3%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
2.1%
2.4%
1.5%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places