Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Renaissance At Kessler Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Angel B
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    I recently joined the team. I am pleased to see management's commitment to the residents and to striving to always do their best. It's a great place to work.

  • Crystal Washington
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This is a nasty place ..dont send ur love one here ..i came out for an interview u n wasnt pleased...the place is awlful. I walked in and with a instant i turned around ..

  • Pam Brooks
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    If I could give this facility a zero I would. My sister was admitted on Sunday. Nursing staff was standing outside, residents in hallway having a wheelchair race, the following day the staff forgot she was there. Therefore she didn't receive breakfast. If it had not been for her son who stayed overnight, no one would have noticed the mistake. Trying desperately to have her moved!!!!! horribleenvironment

  • Tiky
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This was the worst facility to care for my loved one.

  • Steve Castillo
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    There are a few employees that I could commend for being so caring and loving to their patients but for the rest of organization there I must say that they are totally incompetent to care for these poor people. I cringe when I have to go visit my relative. They are rude, slow are rarely there to offer a helping hand. If it wasn't for the few good people there, I would of given them zero stars.

About The Renaissance At Kessler Park

General Information

Legal Business NameRenaissance Snf LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1992 (28 years)
Capacity135
Residents99
Percent Occupied73%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Renaissance At Kessler Park

The Renaissance At Kessler Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 12, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

January 31, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 3 days
---Fine$3,250 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Renaissance At Kessler Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

83.5%
93.2%
93.2%
93.2%
93.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
31.1%
33.3%
32.7%
35.7%
49.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.0%
7.3%
8.1%
7.3%
25.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.0%
15.7%
22.2%
11.2%
20.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.1%
8.3%
6.7%
6.8%
16.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.8%
9.2%
17.3%
5.6%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.4%
6.5%
5.3%
5.6%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3%
1.8%
0.0%
1.7%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.3%
5.4%
5.3%
5.8%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
2.2%
0.0%
1.1%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
3.2%
1.1%
0.9%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
1.1%
2.1%
2.8%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.6%
98.5%
100.0%
100.0%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.2%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
75.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
60.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
19.2%
10.7%
11.5%
11.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places