Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Nazareth Living Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. El Paso
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This facility does not care of their patients. They gave my grandma spoiled food and then forgot her food on another tray. The nurses didn't have tissues for my grandma, so she had to go to her car to grab some tissues for her. It is pretty sad that they are suppose to take care of people but don't have the minimal resources for their patients. My grandma threw up her food and the employees disregarded the accident. The patients are going through a difficult time in their life, how would any sensible human being ignore situations like this? Finally, they lowered my grandmother's oxygen level to "ease her off of it". Then hours later she got rushed to ICU. Their jobs are to help people to get better, ensure the family that their loved one is cared for and make this difficult time a bit easier. Overall, this facility lacks respect, care and love for their patients. I highly suggest families turn a blind eye to Nazareth Living Care Center just like they do to their patients. HORRIBLE EXPERIENCE.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father spent nine days at Nazareth Rehab where the poor quality of care that he received resulted in a life threatening infection and substantial weight loss. He required 7 days of IV antibiotic therapy due to poor infection control practices by nurses. As an experienced RN and former state surveyor I decided that the only chance my father had for survival was to remove him from the facility and manage his care at home with the help of Home Health nurses. I cannot recommend this facility for the rehabilitative care of the elderly unless the family members have sufficient medical knowledge and are able to be actively involved with the care of their loved one while a patient at this facility. I am sorry to report that my father passed away Thursday, Aug 12, 2016.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Nurse practitioner very rude and unprofessional. Would not listen to mom's lungs because she was getting better. She added that in order for Medicare to pay for the visit, there would have to be a problem and from what she could tell, I was the problem.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Nazareth Living Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameNazareth Hall
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 9, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity74
Residents70
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Nazareth Living Care Center

Nazareth Living Care Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that paid feeding assistants 1) completed training; 2) work under the supervision of a RN or LPN; and 3) feed only residents who have no complicated feeding problems.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

June 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Nazareth Living Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.3%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.6%
24.2%
23.3%
30.8%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.6%
17.1%
21.6%
20.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3%
16.7%
11.5%
16.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.0%
17.8%
7.9%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.6%
12.2%
5.4%
6.1%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
3.3%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
5.7%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.0%
14.6%
16.2%
12.1%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3%
4.9%
5.4%
2.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
2.6%
2.4%
2.5%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.9%
89.5%
82.4%
86.8%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.2%
75.4%
75.4%
75.4%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
24.8%
23.1%
32.0%
30.4%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.4%
14.4%
23.8%
24.4%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
2.1%
2.8%
2.2%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places