Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mira Vista Court

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Fort Worth
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Dawn Green
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I will only give one star due to a hand full of CNA's actually care about the residents. I would not, repeat would not admit a family member in Mira Vista. My 85 year old mother had to be transported back to the Hospital twice on my command only because of the lack of concern for her health. The Dietary Dept is horrible. The feeder room is degrading the way they make them wait to because the residents need assistant eating. CNA'S roll residents in at 5pm but they do not get their food until 5:55pm. I sat through this schedule several times and complained about it. Oh did I mention the feeder room does not have a TV or music or any thing entertaining. Just sitting in the quite waiting while the other dining room is as lively as a restaurant. Mira. Vista is beautiful, but that is all. Since my mother could not be left alone as many residents, they are put in a wheelchair and left at the nurses station and they are still not receiving attention or care. My mother had a (bm) and was just sitting there like no one could smell her. She took off her shirt and no one noticed at the nurses station and they thought it was funny. I could go on and on. My mother is now home and she has flourished in health. It's hard but totally worth her dignity. Mira Vista should be shut down.

  • kathleen mae
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Beautiful facility and wonderful staff!

  • Jeffrey Pirinelli
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Great staff, beautiful facility

  • DeadMark
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

  • Lauren Munro
    ★★★★★ a month ago

About Mira Vista Court

General Information

Legal Business NameBryant Irvin Consulting LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 4, 2005 (12 years)
Capacity142
Residents96
Percent Occupied68%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mira Vista Court

Mira Vista Court was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 7, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$18,460 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionMake sure that the facility is administered in an acceptable way that maintains the well-being of each resident .
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

May 15, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintTell the resident or the residents representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the residents bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

February 13, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mira Vista Court require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

37.5%
70.0%
70.0%
70.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.4%
80.5%
93.1%
97.4%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
47.1%
40.9%
36.6%
53.8%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.0%
23.5%
26.2%
26.2%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.8%
19.4%
26.2%
29.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.4%
19.4%
25.0%
24.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.9%
15.9%
18.3%
13.8%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2%
2.6%
1.6%
1.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.2%
7.5%
0.0%
6.8%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3%
5.8%
1.8%
5.3%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1%
7.5%
4.2%
6.8%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8%
2.4%
1.4%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
3.3%
3.3%
2.4%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

24.3%
39.1%
38.3%
36.2%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
22.5%
44.6%
44.6%
44.6%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.7%
54.4%
52.4%
40.4%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
24.7%
17.3%
15.9%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
0.0%
1.2%
2.2%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places