Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Stayton At Museum Way

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Fort Worth
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This place is nice but they WILL NOT accept ANY PATIENT currently or on a Chemotherapy regiment.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I hope that the staff at the facility is more responsive to patients in their care than they are to referral sources. I left several messages for multiple people in the admissions office and no one ever called back. Not sure if a culture that allows luck of professionalism during intake process can be trusted to provide good care!

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    We took my grandfather here for rehab after his knee surgery and it was a complete mess. The staff either forgot or just didn't bother to bring him his dinner. My mother had to go pick him up in the middle of the night because the staff wouldn't give him his pain medication. My aunt lives at the Stayton in Dallas and it has been wonderful. However, the rehab division in Fort Worth was simply unacceptable, especially for the cost.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom went here for rehab after knee surgery! It was perfect in every way! Dr. Aman Haider was wonderful, as well as the nurses, the physical therapists, and every single staff member! Best place ever!

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Worst place ever. Don't trust your loved ones to this place. Staff needs serious training.

About The Stayton At Museum Way

General Information

Legal Business NameTarrant County Senior Living Center, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 29, 2011 (6 years)
Capacity46
Residents41
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Stayton At Museum Way

The Stayton At Museum Way
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

July 17, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,000 fine
---Fine$5,000 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Stayton At Museum Way require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr 5min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
20.0%
-
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.1%
-
-
-
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.8%
0.0%
4.2%
8.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
4.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
4.5%
17.4%
12.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
9.5%
4.0%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.5%
0.0%
18.2%
4.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5%
13.0%
20.8%
16.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
98.8%
100.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.4%
90.4%
90.4%
90.4%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.0%
77.8%
71.6%
59.4%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
1.5%
1.5%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places